1 |
[color=red][u]avrage wind rate[/u][/color]
|
1 |
[color=red][u]avrage wind rate[/u][/color]
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
calculation
is
(
min
wind*%chance
of
min
wind)
+(
avarage
wind)
|
3 |
calculation
is
(
min
wind*%chance
of
min
wind)
+(
avarage
wind*%chance
avrage
wind)
|
4 |
0-2.4 wing avarages 1.2
|
4 |
0-2.4 wing avarages 1.2
|
5 |
.6-2.4 wind avarages (.6*(.6/2.4))+((1.2+(.5*.6))*((2.4-.6)/2.4))=1.275
|
5 |
.6-2.4 wind avarages (.6*(.6/2.4))+((1.2+(.5*.6))*((2.4-.6)/2.4))=1.275
|
6 |
1.2-2.4 wind avarages (1.2*(1.2/2.4))+((1.2+(.5*1.2))*((2.4-1.2)/2.4))=1.5
|
6 |
1.2-2.4 wind avarages (1.2*(1.2/2.4))+((1.2+(.5*1.2))*((2.4-1.2)/2.4))=1.5
|
7 |
1.8-2.4 wind avarages (1.8*(1.8/2.4))+((1.2+(.5*1.8))*((2.4-1.8)/2.4))=1.875
|
7 |
1.8-2.4 wind avarages (1.8*(1.8/2.4))+((1.2+(.5*1.8))*((2.4-1.8)/2.4))=1.875
|
8 |
2.4-2.4 wind avarages 2.4
|
8 |
2.4-2.4 wind avarages 2.4
|
9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
10 |
0 wind 29.16m/e
|
10 |
0 wind 29.16m/e
|
11 |
.6 wind 27.45m/e (beter then a fusion)
|
11 |
.6 wind 27.45m/e (beter then a fusion)
|
12 |
1.2 wind 23.33m/e
|
12 |
1.2 wind 23.33m/e
|
13 |
1.8 wind 18.66m/e (beter then morfing a moho)
|
13 |
1.8 wind 18.66m/e (beter then morfing a moho)
|
14 |
2.4 wind 14.58m/e (beter then a moho)
|
14 |
2.4 wind 14.58m/e (beter then a moho)
|
15 |
\n
|
15 |
\n
|
16 |
1.62 wind 20m/e (beter then a geo)
|
16 |
1.62 wind 20m/e (beter then a geo)
|
17 |
1.92 wind 17.77m/e (beter then a singu)
|
17 |
1.92 wind 17.77m/e (beter then a singu)
|
18 |
\n
|
18 |
\n
|
19 |
\n
|
19 |
\n
|
20 |
also wind is beter then most eco because it makes you more e in tiny steps, so there is much less build time->income lag
|
20 |
also wind is beter then most eco because it makes you more e in tiny steps, so there is much less build time->income lag
|
21 |
\n
|
21 |
\n
|
22 |
2 cons can build a wind in 3.5 sec and a singu in 400sec
|
22 |
2 cons can build a wind in 3.5 sec and a singu in 400sec
|
23 |
\n
|
23 |
\n
|
24 |
[color=red][u]theoretical "lost" overdrive from 1 mex during build time[/u][/color]
|
24 |
[color=red][u]theoretical "lost" overdrive from 1 mex during build time[/u][/color]
|
25 |
(for a few benchmarks) 5m/s bp cons*
|
25 |
(for a few benchmarks) 5m/s bp cons*
|
26 |
\n
|
26 |
\n
|
27 |
2con wind
|
27 |
2con wind
|
28 |
3.5*(2*14%)=.98m "lost"
|
28 |
3.5*(2*14%)=.98m "lost"
|
29 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
2con solar
|
30 |
2con solar
|
31 |
7*(2*(sqrt(1+2/4))-1))= 10m "lost"
|
31 |
7*(2*(sqrt(1+2/4))-1))= 10m "lost"
|
32 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
2con fusion
|
33 |
2con fusion
|
34 |
100*(2*(sqrt(1+35/4))-1))= 524m "lost" [u]1/2 a fusion down the drain[/u]
|
34 |
100*(2*(sqrt(1+35/4))-1))= 524m "lost" [u]1/2 a fusion down the drain[/u]
|
35 |
\n
|
35 |
\n
|
36 |
2con mohogeo
|
36 |
2con mohogeo
|
37 |
(50+150)*(2*(sqrt(1+25/4))-1))= 877m "lost" [u]free fusion![/u]
|
37 |
(50+150)*(2*(sqrt(1+25/4))-1))= 877m "lost" [u]free fusion![/u]
|
38 |
\n
|
38 |
\n
|
39 |
2con singu
|
39 |
2con singu
|
40 |
400*(2*(sqrt(1+225/4))-1))= 5653m "lost" [u]free singu anyone?![/u]
|
40 |
400*(2*(sqrt(1+225/4))-1))= 5653m "lost" [u]free singu anyone?![/u]
|
41 |
\n
|
41 |
\n
|
42 |
10con singu
|
42 |
10con singu
|
43 |
80*(2*(sqrt(1+225/4))-1))= 1130 "lost"
|
43 |
80*(2*(sqrt(1+225/4))-1))= 1130 "lost"
|
44 |
\n
|
44 |
\n
|
45 |
20con singu
|
45 |
20con singu
|
46 |
40*(2*(sqrt(1+225/4))-1))= 565 "lost"
|
46 |
40*(2*(sqrt(1+225/4))-1))= 565 "lost"
|
47 |
\n
|
47 |
\n
|
48 |
\n
|
48 |
\n
|