Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Energy costs

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
2/21/2014 11:19:27 AMGBrankKyubey before revert after revert
2/21/2014 11:17:20 AMGBrankKyubey before revert after revert
2/21/2014 11:16:34 AMGBrankKyubey before revert after revert
2/21/2014 11:14:34 AMGBrankKyubey before revert after revert
2/21/2014 11:13:02 AMGBrankKyubey before revert after revert
2/21/2014 11:11:21 AMGBrankKyubey before revert after revert
Before After
1 [color=red][u]avrage wind rate[/u][/color] 1 [color=red][u]avrage wind rate[/u][/color]
2 \n 2 \n
3 calculation is ( min wind*%chance of min wind) +( avarage wind) 3 calculation is ( min wind*%chance of min wind) +( avarage wind*%chance avrage wind)
4 0-2.4 wing avarages 1.2 4 0-2.4 wing avarages 1.2
5 .6-2.4 wind avarages (.6*(.6/2.4))+((1.2+(.5*.6))*((2.4-.6)/2.4))=1.275 5 .6-2.4 wind avarages (.6*(.6/2.4))+((1.2+(.5*.6))*((2.4-.6)/2.4))=1.275
6 1.2-2.4 wind avarages (1.2*(1.2/2.4))+((1.2+(.5*1.2))*((2.4-1.2)/2.4))=1.5 6 1.2-2.4 wind avarages (1.2*(1.2/2.4))+((1.2+(.5*1.2))*((2.4-1.2)/2.4))=1.5
7 1.8-2.4 wind avarages (1.8*(1.8/2.4))+((1.2+(.5*1.8))*((2.4-1.8)/2.4))=1.875 7 1.8-2.4 wind avarages (1.8*(1.8/2.4))+((1.2+(.5*1.8))*((2.4-1.8)/2.4))=1.875
8 2.4-2.4 wind avarages 2.4 8 2.4-2.4 wind avarages 2.4
9 \n 9 \n
10 0 wind 29.16m/e 10 0 wind 29.16m/e
11 .6 wind 27.45m/e (beter then a fusion) 11 .6 wind 27.45m/e (beter then a fusion)
12 1.2 wind 23.33m/e 12 1.2 wind 23.33m/e
13 1.8 wind 18.66m/e (beter then morfing a moho) 13 1.8 wind 18.66m/e (beter then morfing a moho)
14 2.4 wind 14.58m/e (beter then a moho) 14 2.4 wind 14.58m/e (beter then a moho)
15 \n 15 \n
16 1.62 wind 20m/e (beter then a geo) 16 1.62 wind 20m/e (beter then a geo)
17 1.92 wind 17.77m/e (beter then a singu) 17 1.92 wind 17.77m/e (beter then a singu)
18 \n 18 \n
19 \n 19 \n
20 also wind is beter then most eco because it makes you more e in tiny steps, so there is much less build time->income lag 20 also wind is beter then most eco because it makes you more e in tiny steps, so there is much less build time->income lag
21 \n 21 \n
22 2 cons can build a wind in 3.5 sec and a singu in 400sec 22 2 cons can build a wind in 3.5 sec and a singu in 400sec
23 \n 23 \n
24 [color=red][u]theoretical "lost" overdrive from 1 mex during build time[/u][/color] 24 [color=red][u]theoretical "lost" overdrive from 1 mex during build time[/u][/color]
25 (for a few benchmarks) 5m/s bp cons* 25 (for a few benchmarks) 5m/s bp cons*
26 \n 26 \n
27 2con wind 27 2con wind
28 3.5*(2*14%)=.98m "lost" 28 3.5*(2*14%)=.98m "lost"
29 29
30 2con solar 30 2con solar
31 7*(2*(sqrt(1+2/4))-1))= 10m "lost" 31 7*(2*(sqrt(1+2/4))-1))= 10m "lost"
32 32
33 2con fusion 33 2con fusion
34 100*(2*(sqrt(1+35/4))-1))= 524m "lost" [u]1/2 a fusion down the drain[/u] 34 100*(2*(sqrt(1+35/4))-1))= 524m "lost" [u]1/2 a fusion down the drain[/u]
35 \n 35 \n
36 2con mohogeo 36 2con mohogeo
37 (50+150)*(2*(sqrt(1+25/4))-1))= 877m "lost" [u]free fusion![/u] 37 (50+150)*(2*(sqrt(1+25/4))-1))= 877m "lost" [u]free fusion![/u]
38 \n 38 \n
39 2con singu 39 2con singu
40 400*(2*(sqrt(1+225/4))-1))= 5653m "lost" [u]free singu anyone?![/u] 40 400*(2*(sqrt(1+225/4))-1))= 5653m "lost" [u]free singu anyone?![/u]
41 \n 41 \n
42 10con singu 42 10con singu
43 80*(2*(sqrt(1+225/4))-1))= 1130 "lost" 43 80*(2*(sqrt(1+225/4))-1))= 1130 "lost"
44 \n 44 \n
45 20con singu 45 20con singu
46 40*(2*(sqrt(1+225/4))-1))= 565 "lost" 46 40*(2*(sqrt(1+225/4))-1))= 565 "lost"
47 \n 47 \n
48 \n 48 \n