| 1 |
[quote]is there any reason NOT to give coms an AA weapon? [/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]is there any reason NOT to give coms an AA weapon? [/quote]
|
| 2 |
Yes, and it's called "ugly specific targeting classes".
|
2 |
Yes, and it's called "ugly specific targeting classes".
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
If said weapon is good enough to be effective AA, it cannot be an anti-ground weapon. Having a comm weapon mountable on level 1 chassis that cannot shoot ground is a noobtrap or an inconvenience (like torpedos are).
|
4 |
If said weapon is good enough to be effective AA, it cannot be an anti-ground weapon. Having a comm weapon mountable on level 1 chassis that cannot shoot ground is a noobtrap or an inconvenience (like torpedos are).
|
| 5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
| 6 |
Corollary 1: commander torpedo weapon should be able to fire at ground targets, like Duck.
|
6 |
Corollary 1: commander torpedo weapon should be able to fire at ground targets, like Duck.
|
| 7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
| 8 |
Corollary
2:
if
commander
torpedo
weapon
acts
as
a
duck
missile
on
surface,
and
as
torpedo
in
water,
that
renders
missiles
defunct.
|
8 |
Corollary
2:
if
commander
torpedo
weapon
acts
as
a
duck
missile
on
surface,
and
as
torpedo
in
water,
that
renders
missiles
unnecessary.
|
| 9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
| 10 |
Corollary 3: missile and torpedo weapon should be merged for commanders in a way that allows it to shoot L->L, L->UW, and UW->UW but not UW->L (because then it would be the dreaded sonic gun)
|
10 |
Corollary 3: missile and torpedo weapon should be merged for commanders in a way that allows it to shoot L->L, L->UW, and UW->UW but not UW->L (because then it would be the dreaded sonic gun)
|
Balance Feedback 03/2014