Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

PL-01 CONCEPT

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
4/1/2014 4:37:39 PMPLrankFailer before revert after revert
4/1/2014 4:35:43 PMPLrankFailer before revert after revert
Before After
1 [quote]Precedent says that anything looking futuristic at time of being designed will be either only prototype (fighter jets with backswept wings, soviet nuke proof saucer tanks, flying saucer cars... etc), be extremely costly while impractical (f117, soviet laser pistols, THEL) or awesome and cheap while still impractical (gyrojet rocket rifles, steyr caseless rounds, caspian beast). [/quote] 1 [quote]Precedent says that anything looking futuristic at time of being designed will be either only prototype (fighter jets with backswept wings, soviet nuke proof saucer tanks, flying saucer cars... etc), be extremely costly while impractical (f117, soviet laser pistols, THEL) or awesome and cheap while still impractical (gyrojet rocket rifles, steyr caseless rounds, caspian beast). [/quote]
2 \n 2 \n
3 If ure talking about the pl-01, Ive got interested in the topic, and they have already designed the drive system. Total weight is going ot be 33, or 39 ( with additional armour) tonnes. That is 3/5 of newest abrams. What is more its going to be much faster than it, better armoured, better armed, and will be able to carry 4 additional infantry units ( glaveis? lel) inside, not mentioning all those active defence systems. Tl;DR - on paper it's OP. 3 If ure talking about the pl-01, Ive got interested in the topic, and they have already designed the drive system. Total weight is going ot be 33, or 39 ( with additional armour) tonnes. Even the heavier one is 3/5 of newest abrams. What is more its going to be much faster than it, better armoured, better armed, and will be able to carry 4 additional infantry units ( glaveis? lel) inside, not mentioning all those active defence systems. Tl;DR - on paper it's OP.
4 May be it's not going to be cheap, but its going to be used, becasue polish defence ministry has said taht they are going to buy quite a few. We have to modernise our military, they said. All we have now are old T-80s. Modernised a bit, but stil they are 30 YO. In military its a whole age. 4 May be it's not going to be cheap, but its going to be used, becasue polish defence ministry has said taht they are going to buy quite a few. We have to modernise our military, they said. All we have now are old T-80s. Modernised a bit, but stil they are 30 YO. In military its a whole age.
5 \n 5 \n
6 Enough of polish hipocricy ^^ 6 Enough of polish hipocricy ^^
7 \n 7 \n
8 Talking about units models. Ye may be devs should upgrade both HV and LV facs. I mean its not primary objective, but devs should put a little effort into this. Don't forget, that good looking game attracts more players. 8 Talking about units models. Ye may be devs should upgrade both HV and LV facs. I mean its not primary objective, but devs should put a little effort into this. Don't forget, that good looking game attracts more players.
9 \n 9 \n
10 Since it's off-topic thread, I have to ask. Why do we have no particle or lazor tank yet? Lol. 10 Since it's off-topic thread, I have to ask. Why do we have no particle or lazor tank yet? Lol.