1 |
@Brackman But making total elo (or average per team) equal isnt he way to balance teams.
|
1 |
@Brackman But making total elo (or average per team) equal isnt he way to balance teams.
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
Look -
|
3 |
Look -
|
4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
5 |
2k + 2k + 1k + 1k = 6k
|
5 |
2k + 2k + 1k + 1k = 6k
|
6 |
1,5k + 1,5k + 1,5k + 1,5k = 6k as well.
|
6 |
1,5k + 1,5k + 1,5k + 1,5k = 6k as well.
|
7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
8 |
Balanced? Not really.
|
8 |
Balanced? Not really.
|
9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
10 |
There are at least 2, sometimes 3 or even more possibilities to balance elo numbers equealy. Problem is, current balance amost always pick the worst one.
|
10 |
There are at least 2, sometimes 3 or even more possibilities to balance elo numbers equealy. Problem is, current balance amost always pick the worst one.
|
11 |
\n
|
11 |
\n
|
12 |
With those numbers good balance would be:
|
12 |
With those numbers good balance would be:
|
13 |
2k + 1,5k + 1,5k + 1k = 6k
|
13 |
2k + 1,5k + 1,5k + 1k = 6k
|
14 |
Both
teams
would
be
actually
equal,
but
the
Balance
system
would
pick
the
1st
way
propaly.
|
14 |
Both
teams
would
be
actually
equal,
but
the
Balance
system
would
pick
the
1st
way
propably.
|