1 |
[quote] Wasn't there also a support com BP reduction at lower levels? It's not mentioned in the post. [/quote]
|
1 |
[quote] Wasn't there also a support com BP reduction at lower levels? It's not mentioned in the post. [/quote]
|
2 |
That was reverted.
|
2 |
That was reverted.
|
3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
4 |
[quote] as torpedo module is now gone, which weapons can fire at subs[/quote]
|
4 |
[quote] as torpedo module is now gone, which weapons can fire at subs[/quote]
|
5 |
The boi is now defenseless in water. You'll have to use urchins. Good thing they're OP now.
|
5 |
The boi is now defenseless in water. You'll have to use urchins. Good thing they're OP now.
|
6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
7 |
[quote]You gave two shitty options and people picked the less shitty one[/quote]
|
7 |
[quote]You gave two shitty options and people picked the less shitty one[/quote]
|
8 |
I figure you want the Eagle back?
|
8 |
I figure you want the Eagle back?
|
9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
10 |
[quote]gremlin and conjurer sound weird. [/quote]
|
10 |
[quote]gremlin and conjurer sound weird. [/quote]
|
11 |
Conjurer
is
a
con.
Gremlin
borks
planes.
|
11 |
Conjurer
makes
things
out
of
thin
air,
and
is
a
con.
Gremlin
borks
planes.
|
12 |
\n
|
12 |
\n
|
13 |
What is a "jethro"?
|
13 |
What is a "jethro"?
|
14 |
\n
|
14 |
\n
|
15 |
[quote] Was complete removal of the ecell really necessary? [/quote]
|
15 |
[quote] Was complete removal of the ecell really necessary? [/quote]
|
16 |
Would you have gone for the useless-cell instead? Something like +2 e for 100m?
|
16 |
Would you have gone for the useless-cell instead? Something like +2 e for 100m?
|