Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   
Map: Throne v1
 Throne v1
Title: [A] Free For All
Host: Nobody
Game version: Zero-K v1.9.1.1
Engine version: 104.0.1-1544-ge1f249f
Battle ID: 1050503
Started: 3 years ago
Duration: 65 minutes
Players: 7
Bots: False
Mission: False
Rating: Casual
Watch Replay Now
Manual download

Team 1 Lost
Chance of victory: 0.2%
XP gained: 94
CZrankLooChenChanCZ died in 65 minutes
Team 2 Lost
Chance of victory: 0.3%
XP gained: 94
CZrankLoocheenchancz died in 22 minutes
Team 3 Lost
Chance of victory: 0.3%
XP gained: 94
ROrankJoeDoe died in 65 minutes
Team 4 Lost
Chance of victory: 40.9%
XP gained: 94
LUrankAdminAnir died in 59 minutes
Team 5 Lost
Chance of victory: 2.1%
XP gained: 94
unknownrankChomolungma died in 53 minutes
Team 6 Won!
Chance of victory: 56.2%
XP gained: 97
RUrankizirayd
Team 7 Lost
Chance of victory: 0%
XP gained: 94
GBrankneko died in 7 minutes
Spectators
DEranknassier
ATrankATOSTIC
USrankPetTurtle
unknownrank1RAVEn
CNrankNT
DErankMukeshBatra
ILrankyuvyuv
DErank[FREEWolle]




Preview
Filter:    Player:  
sort
RUrankizirayd
3 years ago
70% chance of winning? It felt like 33% ._.
+1 / -0


unknownrankShaman
3 years ago
(edited 3 years ago)
Heaven forbid you only have a little over twice the expected balanced win percentage (14.2%) instead of almost 5x it.

I really do not understand people. Balance like never gives good stats and yet people take it like it's gospel.
+0 / -0

DErankkatastrophe
3 years ago
i think izi is criticising exactly that balancer never gives good stats.
+0 / -0


unknownrankShaman
3 years ago
(edited 3 years ago)
Maybe. Though his past behavior really makes it hard to make that conclusion.
+0 / -0
RUrankizirayd
3 years ago
this is because the calculation of the rating does not come from ffa elo
+0 / -0
RUrankizirayd
3 years ago
This is not criticism, just funny
+2 / -0