Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Unit X is OP!

6 posts, 1273 views
Post comment
Filter:    Player:  
sort
12 years ago
I am just starting to get tired of all the "Unit X is OP and unit Y is UP" threads.

First of all, when you go for a unit that is not the only unit you get, you get a "set of units" that comes with your factory. Local imbalances are fine, it adds to the game. If you are really good playing with skirmishers you should be able to pick the factory with the best skirmisher to really exploit that OR pick the factory with the worst ones since your skills would bring them up to par with the other ones and thus giving you better units in roles you are not as good with. A unit is not OP because it kills all the other factories equivalents in a straight up 1v1 fight. A unit should ONLY and I mean ONLY be considered OP if the game degrades to building that unit. In other words when the building of that unit is the only valid strategy you can go with because if you do not, your opponent will. If you think a unit is in needs a nerf prove it by degrade the game unto that unit, that way the developers HAVE to nerf it in order to keep the game balanced and varied.

A unit is not over powered because you have a hard time countering it. If there is a unit you frequently lose to, copy that players strategy and use it yourself. Either his strategy is better then your and in that case you should use it instead of your strategy, why should you not play the game in a way that makes you win? What is more likely to happen is that you will come across a player that knows how to play against whatever it is you are doing and then you can learn from him, find out how to counter it and then go back to your original strategy.

Under powered units are a bit harder. A unit is not underpowered because it is the worst in its category compared to its counterparts. Remember, you do not buy a single unit, you buy a set of units when you build a factory so if its other units are stronger then their counterparts then it is fine. A better question is "What factory do players not play with?" and then ask yourself "Why are people not playing with this factory?" It may be because it is a situational factory, it is only a valid pick on certain maps. Is the naval factory under powered because no one builds them on land maps? No, it is because a naval factory is not good factory for that type of map. Is the spider factory under powered because you never see it on Red comet? No, because spiders are not meant for big, open maps, they are meant for hilly maps with lots of cliffs where they can really exploit their wall-climbing advantage.

A factory is under powered when it is never built, no matter what map or situation you are in. Now we can start working on bringing it up to pair with the other factories by improving its units. When doing this, I suggest a ridiculous big boost. A small boost wont help since people are already in the mindset that this factory wont work so they wont even try it. It is better to make the factory over powered instead so players start to use it and then slightly nerf it back down once it is back in the game.

Cheers! -Emblis
+0 / -0

12 years ago
It is worthwhile to keep in mind that a factory only costs 550. If you really have the 'best' unit of a class, you can mix factories fairly easily into the midgame, or with coordinated teams. At one period in CA it was very common to spam hammer+janus, for example. Rather, every unit should have different situational appropriateness and unique set of abilities. The Halberd, say, is not the 'best' assault unit, but when closed it has the highest HP/cost this side of Dirtbag. The Ravager isn't 'best' either, it's just really fast for an assault, and while the Reaper certainly competes for the 'best' trophy, it's particularly bad against raiders. We try to make units so that there ARE no direct equivalents, so that you don't want to mix recluse+moderator+reaper+mace+warrior+bandit every game.

We do NOT buff units (or factories) merely so people will use them. The game should ideally work towards a state where everything is balanced regardless of where the metagame is at and regardless of what preconceptions a player brings to the game. This is difficult, I know, but we shouldn't break it -on purpose- to 'force' the metagame to shift. So many times an unpopular unit has been buffed and buffed and buffed (by KR...) until someone finally uses it again and it breaks the whole game, meaning we generally nerf it into oblivion again.
+0 / -0
I like to aim for both approaches. As in units in the factory should work together to be good as Emblis said. Additionally if you have access to any 2 factories there should still be some situation which would cause you to choose each of the units from those factories (which is what Sak said).

Game degradation, while the final decider for an OP unit, can be hard to spot. The trivial case is when a single unit is spammed but there are more complex cases where the game revolves heavily around a single unit which reduces the overall diversity of strategies.

I don't really know where that was going. The more basic issue is a lack of players to test all the facets of balance.

But on the other topic I am not tired of the threads. It is nice that people care about the balance enough to post.
+0 / -0

12 years ago
valkiyres/roaches work very nicely if you dont fail them into AA ;)
+0 / -0
I think most the players who post here are high enough elo to be beyond 'posting a unit is OP because they themselves can't counter it'.

I personally post unit OP after abusing it for a while, and UP when I never want to build it (+ ofc call allies noobs for building it, like the Tremor.)

Likewise, I think a factory is under-powered when it is more difficult and less rewarding to use than other factories (like spiders). I don't like the approach of 'different factories have a different OP unit' because its trivial to build a second factory and spam a mix of OP units.

IMO:
In an ideal world, if there was only 1 factory - and it could build every unit - there would be a situation in which players would use each and every unit.
+0 / -0
Skasi
12 years ago
MOJJJ!!! BLASTWINGS!!!
+0 / -0