Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   
Map: Tricy_Run_v6.1
 Tricy_Run_v6.1
Title: [A] Teams All Welcome
Host: Nobody
Game version: Zero-K v1.9.2.0
Engine version: 104.0.1-1544-ge1f249f
Battle ID: 1054115
Started: 4 years ago
Duration: 12 minutes
Players: 17
Bots: False
Mission: False
Rating: None
Watch Replay Now
Manual download

Team 1

CNrankwptr_007
DErankzini
FIrankAdminAlcur
ESrankdark_gf
RUrankslava1
CNrankLeifa
USrank12pumpkin83oak
CNrankkey2000
Team 2

DErankHoppili
Firepluk
GBrankPresstabstart
THrankPootis
ILrankrollmops
CNrankdiligentdolphin
KRrankguddyd1313
BErankXYBORG
FIrankincognito3211657
Spectators
AUrank4hundred
AUrankSortale
DErankChesti
AUrankAdminAquanim
BErankAmpul
GBrankczesio
USrankNitrivv
DErankwwwecosiade
USrankDamon1107
CNrankYeye77

Show winners



Preview
Filter:    Player:  
sort
Firepluk
4 years ago
(edited 4 years ago)
nice, AUrankAdminAquanim(while being a spec admin) ruining balance to kick ESrankdark_gf from a running game because he is banned?
couldn't do this shit before or after the game?...

quote:

[17:35] Aquanim: i care more about getting rid of abusive harassing fuckers


...
+0 / -0
AUrankStuff
4 years ago
(edited 4 years ago)
quote:

[17:35] Aquanim: i care more about getting rid of abusive harassing fuckers


The chatlogs sound like a goldmine... Now I'm curious. what other things have been said?
+2 / -0
AUrankStuff
4 years ago
(edited 4 years ago)
Came looking for gold but found something much more intresting

Here's the entire chat logs for anybody who wants to read through them. (you're probably looking for the one below)

[Spoiler]

And here is all the relevent chat

[Spoiler]
+0 / -0



unknownrankShaman
4 years ago
(edited 4 years ago)
The assertion that abusers can be allowed to continue to abuse for "just one more game!" simply on the premise of it "ruining a game" is a failed argument because there were already ruined games by the abuser. Multiple of them. Where was your outrage then? It was ok then but when a solution is enacted you get outraged because it mildly is inconvenient to you?

Remember this well before taking that position up: abusers aren't just verbally abusive people but also griefers. Starting this precedent is dangerous because then it turns into just one more game for teamkillers or game crashers because "muh balance" is more important..
+0 / -0

AUrankAdminAquanim
4 years ago
(edited 4 years ago)
For context ESrankdark_gf had already been modactioned an hour or two earlier for harassing USrank12pumpkin83oak, and he was totally aware it was not acceptable. If you want to whinge at somebody for ruining this game go whinge at him. Allowing ESrankdark_gf to ruin a game and perhaps the overall Zero-K experience of one or more players by being toxic does not really represent an improvement over whatever impact kicking him had on this game.

I encourage anybody wishing to discuss this further to review part 5 of the Code of Conduct.
+1 / -0
NZrankesainane
4 years ago
Perhaps if one of the highest rated players is kicked a few minutes into a game that has small teams, the affected team could be asked if they want the game exited, or the game could be retroactively marked noelo?
+3 / -0

AUrankAdminAquanim
4 years ago
(edited 4 years ago)
quote:
or the game could be retroactively marked noelo?

Sure, that can be done.
+2 / -0