Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   
Back to List

Real Europe V4 Featured

By Nixa
Rating:

FFA map for 4-16 players! T2 amphib tanks move at 75% speed. Version 4. By Nixa
Size: 24 x 24

PLAY ON THIS MAP


Downloads: 8967
Manual downloads:
http://spring1.admin-box.com/downloads/spring/spring-maps/real_europe_v4.sdz
https://zero-k.info/content/maps/real_europe_v4.sdz
http://api.springfiles.com/files/maps/real_europe_v4.sdz
http://zero-k.info/content/maps/real_europe_v4.sdz


Preview
Filter:    Player:  
sort
{redacted}
7 years ago
why is this map featured?
+0 / -0
7 years ago
Why is Mearth_v4 featured? Or another FFA map???
+0 / -0
7 years ago
What maps do you expect to be featured? Should we discuss this in map tagging too? (=
+0 / -0


7 years ago
Oops I misclicked update without changing anything. I hope the settings are reasonable.

The map looks reasonable so for that reason I think featuring is appropriate. Unfortunately featuring is directly linked to PW in that featured maps are used to determine the planet map pool. I think the best solution would be to improve the PW algorithm to disregard featured maps that are tagged as FFA.
+0 / -0
{redacted}
7 years ago
Nevermind! I thought all featured maps were on PW, but got enlightened soon after.

GoogleFrog, I've been told only maps with a 'Planetwars image' (which is silly btw :P) are used for PW.
+0 / -0
6 years ago
Removed box 12 only got 2 mex tagged as 15

!addbox 38 14 10 10 12
+0 / -0

3 months ago
the middle players are normally fucked as well when players know how to focus on best players in the FFA

Could it be possible to arraange the starting positions to fair positions?
I can search for at least two games where unfairness happened
+0 / -0
3 months ago
only the weak whine about unfairness.
+0 / -0

3 months ago
mojjj explain how those starting positions are fair. I played this map in both positions and considered it every time as unfair
+0 / -0
Don’t worry.
+0 / -2
3 months ago
This map is a cancer anyway.
+2 / -0
Back to List