Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   
Back to List

CliffHanger-v1 Supported

By cheesecan
Rating:

CliffHanger-v1. 4 to 14 players.
Size: 20 x 20

PLAY ON THIS MAP


Downloads: 2972
Manual downloads:
http://spring1.admin-box.com/downloads/spring/spring-maps/CliffHanger-v1.sd7
http://api.springfiles.com/files/maps/cliffhanger-v1.sd7
http://zero-k.info/content/maps/CliffHanger-v1.sd7


Preview
Filter:    Player:  
Page of 2 (25 records)
sort
7 years ago
Wrong name for a nice map - I don't see many cliffs.
+0 / -0
6 years ago
Not a fan of this map its layout is uninteresting.

unfeature?
+0 / -0

6 years ago
Yeah frankly it's not great.
+0 / -0
6 years ago
Should this not have an asymmetrical tag? Looks asymmetrical enough.
+0 / -0


6 years ago
Map is ugly and all, but doesn't really play that bad, had some interesting games in it.
+0 / -0
6 years ago
This is actual designed as a FFA map. I am planning on making it into such and adding FFA boxes we are missing a 9 way FAA map. Is that ok with everyone?
+0 / -0
GBrankSab
5 years ago
Remove this map from FFA maps pool pls
+3 / -0


5 years ago
How did it get featured at all? :0

I'll wait a day to see if anyone objects removal. That is a threat.
+1 / -0
{redacted}
5 years ago
Map ain't that bad, is it? Just shouldn't be FFA.
+0 / -0
5 years ago
It looks like it would be alright for 4v4 north vs south.
+0 / -0
{redacted}
5 years ago
Just look at the size. More like 20v20. Honk!
+0 / -0
5 years ago
A 20v20 map would have to be at least 160x16. 20x20 is only a small teams map size.
+0 / -2
5 years ago
Orly?
+1 / -0
5 years ago
Map is awful, kill it with fire
+2 / -0
5 years ago
What @Storage wanted to say is to remove this map from ffa, and make a icy run ffa map so we can enjoy. He told me in private that he likes icy run a lot but doesnt admit it in the lobby:P.
+0 / -1

5 years ago
i un-ffa-ed it when the first one (@saab) started crying. plz stop crying. the reason is gone.
+1 / -1
5 years ago
This is our only 9 player FFA map. The map is designed as a FFA map.
+0 / -3

5 years ago
This map is clearly designed as top team vs bottom team.
+1 / -1
{redacted}
All evidence suggests that this map was designed and created solely for the purpose of 1v2v3v4v5 with no spawn boxes and players being able to spawn anywhere.

Anybody who argues that players should decide how they would like to play is thus clearly either insane or a criminal! HOOOOONK!!!
+0 / -0
Players appeared disappointed due to the FFA balance that was brought about thanks to this map in the Zero-K: All Welcome room. Players seem to consider the host an abode of team games. Consequently, is this map showing up there regarded as valuable by the circle of administrators and developers?
+0 / -0
Page of 2 (25 records)
Back to List