Blindside_v2 map

Back to List

Blindside_v2

By Beherith

Rating:

Blindside v1 - for up to 16 players. Made by [teh]Beherith

Size:

32 x 16

PLAY ON THIS MAP

Downloads: 15115

Manual downloads:
http://zero-k.info/content/games/Blindside_v2.sd7

Last battles

B2252767 4 on Blindside_v2

B2252727 3 on Blindside_v2

B2252723 3 on Blindside_v2

B2252620 2 on Blindside_v2

B2252587 2 on Blindside_v2

B2252555 2 on Blindside_v2

B2252551 2 on Blindside_v2

B2252184 1 on Blindside_v2

B2251990 3 on Blindside_v2

B2251946 2 on Blindside_v2

Filter: Player:

Page of 2 (32 records)

sort
Skasi 13 years ago UGH! Removed from PW until Spring engines performance increases. In PW you can not pick which maps you want to play on, you pick the planet you want to conquer. Maps that some players can not play on do not belong there. Another option would be to use a fixed metal multiplier for maps like this when played in PW. +0 / -0
sprang 13 years ago Good riddance, I approve. Doesn't seem that great for teamgames anyway. +0 / -0
GoogleFrog 13 years ago What is wrong with this map technically? +0 / -0
Anthem 13 years ago Gigantic. +0 / -0
Skasi 13 years ago It's like Speedmetal, only with mountains. The big mountain areas offer space for massive windfarms that are more cost efficient than Geos and combined with the many metal spots lead to massive income and thus unit output. In addition to that the sheer size adds to the maps hardware devouring characteristics. +0 / -0
Skasi 13 years ago Hint: Kick everyone who builds Geo, ban everyone who builds fusion. Protip: DO NOT GET LOW FPS/LAG +0 / -0
Jasper 13 years ago This map has way to much metal. It plays like speed metal. +0 / -0
[1uP]Willk 13 years ago Why doesn't this have an FFA tag? +0 / -0
Jasper 13 years ago Is it a FFA map? people have been playing it with a vertical split. +0 / -0
Pxtl 13 years ago @Willk - the problem is that we pre-configure Springie with start boxes so people don't have to write their !addbox commands manually. But we can only do one Springie profile per-map. So you have to pick, either a map is an FFA map or it isn't. Otherwise you've got FFA boxes in a Team map and Team boxes in an FFA map. You can't have it both ways. This map may work as an FFA map, but it's obviously better as a team map so it's handled as a team map. +0 / -0
GoogleFrog 13 years ago This doesn't work that well as FFA. There is too much difference between edges and middles. +0 / -0
[1uP]Willk 13 years ago Ah k, but yea that was the original premice Behe was going for as I remeber, guess it just didn't work out. +0 / -0
Saktoth 13 years ago I'd like to see how this plays NvS, where it is a lot less huege. So i've set the boxes that way. +0 / -0
GoogleFrog 13 years ago If the distance to your opponents is significantly larger than the size of the front games tend to turn into a lot of parallel 1v1s. +0 / -0
Jasper 13 years ago These big maps are played with a lot of players. At least in normal games, I think it may play better this way, before left had a huge advantage. +0 / -0
Saktoth 13 years ago Parallell 1v1's? Then we definitely need to try this map NvS. +0 / -0
GoogleFrog 13 years ago Parallel 1v1 games are boring because you often end up with 2v1 in various places and a large skill mismatches. +0 / -0
Jasper 13 years ago Well unless it is 6vs6 or less you will not have Parallel 1v1. +0 / -0
sprang 13 years ago Or maybe just remove this from official... it's bad for both FFA and teamgames. +0 / -0
Jasper 13 years ago I would be fine with it being removed. Athought NvS + amphibs + comm drop may fix it. +0 / -0

Page of 2 (32 records)

Back to List