Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Forum index  > General discussion   > PlanetWars   >

Trade

22 posts, 1049 views
Post comment
Filter:    Player:  
Page of 2 (22 records)
sort

FIrankLobHunter
12 years ago
I'd very much like to see trade system back, to sell influence, planets, share metal within clan, you name it.
+0 / -0


EErankAdminAnarchid
12 years ago
(edited 12 years ago)
Metal sharing is the most important of these, especially since it's become a very scarse resourse, and nobody in Dynasty has quota of over 40% (which isn't much).

Selling owned shares of planets is possible with a treaty. It's just that you can't sell it from "locals", which i believe would quickly lead to exponential.
+0 / -0


CZrankAdminLicho
12 years ago
Trade is already possible as part of diplomacy you can trade influence, metal etc.
+0 / -0

DErankAdminmojjj
12 years ago
what is a tech trade or tech treaty then?
+0 / -0
USrank[1uP]Willk
12 years ago
It isn't much right now because no one wants to save it mostly. Else we'd probably have the Warp Core Fab by now...
+0 / -0


AUrankAdminGoogleFrog
12 years ago
I think the quotas could go to 100%. Just elect people who propose plans that you agree with.
+0 / -0
USrank[1uP]Willk
12 years ago
Maybe for the Heads of State. I think the scaling is good for metal although for the lower classes. The others probably should be higher although, since numbers are smaller (like 70% maybe)
+0 / -0

AUrankAdminSaktoth
12 years ago
The 40% share fails because you can juts build a thing, then you get 40% of the leftovers anyway. It only serves to stop the metal falling below 160 because the cheapest thing you can make is 100: But this prevents you leveraging your metal to make the more expensive structures.
+0 / -0


AUrankAdminGoogleFrog
12 years ago
Why are you all stuck in this idea that the appointed people are lower classes? The appointables are the responsibility of the electable and they are to help the electable do their role. If nobody is trusted to spend resources for the good of the faction then don't elect anyone.

But at the moment the idea seems to be that quotas should be tiny enough to be given out like candy without much risk. With the latest iteration of the quota system that is false.
+0 / -0
USrank[1uP]Willk
12 years ago
(edited 12 years ago)
Never mind my post. I have completly miss read how Dynasty's government system works. The high quotas make sense.
+0 / -0
USrankJasper
12 years ago
Trade is bugged You cannot trade planets in diplomacy.
+0 / -0
GBrankAizen
12 years ago
should be able to trade metal / planets with other people in same faction
+0 / -0


CZrankAdminLicho
12 years ago
You can trade planets in diplomacy of course.. there is give influence.
+0 / -0


CZrankAdminLicho
12 years ago
Tech trade is for sharing technologies (unlocks) which are atm missing from db so they dont exist in game.
+0 / -0


MYrankAdminHistidine
12 years ago
So would anyone object if I increased quotas to 100% for everyone?
+0 / -0


CZrankAdminLicho
12 years ago
No not 100% imo thats too much responsibility. I would have to recall half of people...
+0 / -0


CZrankAdminLicho
12 years ago
Especally generals commanding ships dont need that much!
+0 / -0


AUrankAdminGoogleFrog
12 years ago
With the current system a person with 25% ship quota can place all but 3 ships. So we may as well do 100%.

If you think you'll have to recall people then then you should not have appointed them in the first place. 40% quota is almost as dangerous especially when your faction is saving for something.
+0 / -0
USrankJasper
12 years ago
40% quota for metal makes super projects much harder.
+0 / -0


AUrankAdminGoogleFrog
12 years ago
quote:
So would anyone object if I increased quotas to 100% for everyone?
Nobody has objected.
+0 / -0
Page of 2 (22 records)