Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   
Back to List

Rapids_v1 Featured

By Beherith
Rating:

Rapids_v1 - for 1v1 all arms. All units pass shallows. Made by [teh]Beherith (mysterme[at]gmail.com)
Size: 8 x 8

PLAY ON THIS MAP


Downloads: 27972
Manual downloads:
https://springfiles.springrts.com/files/maps/rapids_v1.sd7
http://zero-k.info/content/maps/rapids_v1.sd7
http://zero-k.info/content/maps/Rapids_v1.sd7

Last battles

Multiplayer B2538001 2 on Rapids_v1
Bots B2537031 3 on Rapids_v1
Bots B2537029 3 on Rapids_v1
Bots B2536715 2 on Rapids_v1
Multiplayer B2536346 14 on Rapids_v1
Bots B2535693 1 on Rapids_v1
Multiplayer B2535667 2 on Rapids_v1
Multiplayer B2535653 2 on Rapids_v1
Multiplayer B2535327 2 on Rapids_v1
Bots B2533752 2 on Rapids_v1


Preview
Filter:    Player:  
sort
UArankBoBaH
14 years ago
Very nice map. Good work!
+0 / -0


AUrankAdminGoogleFrog
13 years ago
The image for this map fails to load in a ZKL battleroom.
+0 / -0
Skasi
12 years ago
Symmetry needs to be fixed. Southeast mex is not standardized and someone said hovers can climb one of the (hill) bases but not the other.
+0 / -0

CArankPxtl
12 years ago
For bugs like that, should the approach be "unfeature first and ask questions later"?
+0 / -1
Skasi
12 years ago
Maybe first ask if people still looove the map for all its other features. Personally I don't, but others might
+2 / -0
USrankJasper
12 years ago
Hovers have a hard time getting on to the hills because its a narrow path. I will check I know they can get onto bottom hill.
+0 / -0
USrankJasper
12 years ago
Tested hover can get on and off both hill however on both hills they require micro and they get stuck.
+2 / -0

USrankStuart98
11 years ago
This map is bad and whoever featured it should feel bad. Unfeature please.
+3 / -0
Skasi
11 years ago
All it needs is smoother ramps for better and more symmetric hover pathing, nu?
+0 / -0
PLrankOrfelius
11 years ago
If it is broken/uninteresting in current state then unfeature. Personally I think it is.
Saying "it could be easily fixed" is not an argument for keeping it in the current mappool. If it is going to be fixed then it might be reintroduced.
Simple as that.
+1 / -0
Back to List