Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Solving our issues.

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
1/7/2015 5:54:47 PMDErankBrackman before revert after revert
1/7/2015 5:54:16 PMDErankBrackman before revert after revert
1/7/2015 5:51:37 PMDErankBrackman before revert after revert
1/7/2015 5:39:54 PMDErankBrackman before revert after revert
1/7/2015 5:37:40 PMDErankBrackman before revert after revert
Before After
1 What I really support is a "No Elo" room for practicing purposes. It should be balanced by elo, but not affect it. noelo modoption is not the same as a room. However people should play at least about a third of their games ranked to keep their elo updated. 1 What I really support is a "No Elo" room for practicing purposes. It should be balanced by elo, but not affect it. noelo modoption is not the same as a room. However people should play at least about a third of their games ranked to keep their elo updated.
2 \n 2 \n
3 As this could hardly be forced, a much better possibility could be hidden "casual elo" for this room. Of course it would be like normal (teams and 1v1) elo now, but there would be a differentiaion between serious playing and only practising. 3 As this could hardly be forced, a much better possibility could be hidden "casual elo" for this room. Of course it would be like normal (teams and 1v1) elo now, but there would be a differentiaion between serious playing and only practising.
4 People could even choose if they want their normal or casual elo affected while playing together in the same room. (But there would need to be a timer to change it. Otherwise people could increase their elo by selecting if they use a better probability prediction system than currently implemented.)