Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Please remove Chesti admin ... once again

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
5/2/2016 6:18:23 PMunknownrankShaman before revert after revert
Before After
1 [quote]you are completely ignoring fact I was completely wrong about eco, proving me right, and proving you wrong. I mentioned this fact in the forum topic.[/quote] 1 [quote]you are completely ignoring fact I was completely wrong about eco, proving me right, and proving you wrong. I mentioned this fact in the forum topic.[/quote]
2 \n 2 \n
3 You're still caught up on rationalizing it based on this? You gave away intel (even if it is false) that players on either side [u]don't[/u] have access to and caused your winning team to resign. This is what @Chesti was talking about and in fact, if you want the reasoning behind it is because by allowing a fringe speccheat thing to go will lead to more fringe speccheats which will eventually lead to full blown speccheats. 3 You're still caught up on rationalizing it based on this? You gave away intel (even if it is false) that players on either side [u]don't[/u] have access to and caused your winning team to resign. This is what @Chesti was talking about and in fact, if you want the reasoning behind it is because by allowing a fringe speccheat thing to go will lead to more fringe speccheats which will eventually lead to full blown speccheats.
4 \n 4 \n
5 You may be right on the information was wrong, but you still had an influence on the decision making of the team as a spectator ( it is known that spectators have full access to the information = assumed trust = resign time) . 5 You may be right on the information was wrong, but you still had an influence on the decision making of the team as a spectator ( it is known that spectators have full access to the information -> assumed trust = resign time) .