| 1 |
{{{Hobby Horse => AGGRIEVE}}}
|
1 |
{{{Hobby Horse => AGGRIEVE}}}
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
Would granting it some antisub properties be a buff? Most amphs these days surface to attack, so i somewhat doubt the claim that it means that it starts suddenly countering the totality of amph.
|
3 |
Would granting it some antisub properties be a buff? Most amphs these days surface to attack, so i somewhat doubt the claim that it means that it starts suddenly countering the totality of amph.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
Flying into the range of a bunch of surfaced scallops and buoys generally sounds like a very bad idea already; meanwhile, the only combat amph that simply does not ever surface is the Duck and i'm not sure the Revenant would do much to those anyway.
|
5 |
Flying into the range of a bunch of surfaced scallops and buoys generally sounds like a very bad idea already; meanwhile, the only combat amph that simply does not ever surface is the Duck and i'm not sure the Revenant would do much to those anyway.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
(The other non-surfacing amph units are Conch, Lobster, and Djinn)
|
7 |
(The other non-surfacing amph units are Conch, Lobster, and Djinn)
|
| 8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 9 |
The antisub version of the weapon could also be tuned similarly to how Duck has different properties to torps and missiles - for example, Revenant in antisub mode could unleash ballistic depth charges rather than missiles. This would allow the interactions to be tuned further as needed.
|
9 |
The antisub version of the weapon could also be tuned similarly to how Duck has different properties to torps and missiles - for example, Revenant in antisub mode could unleash ballistic depth charges rather than missiles. This would allow the interactions to be tuned further as needed.
|
|
|
10 |
\n
|
|
|
11 |
An antisub-capable Revenant could be somewhat threatening to Seawolves i guess, but between Cutters and Zephyrs, if the ship AA complement can actually deal with [i]anything[/i], it's that.
|
Revenant buff