| 1 |
Prior to the targetting change and whatever other changes happened to rover/hover in the last 6 months, rover and hover matchups were extremely common on flatlands and there was very unclear evidence to suggest which factory was on top. Today, it absolutely feels as though hover is on top.
|
1 |
Prior to the targetting change and whatever other changes happened to rover/hover in the last 6 months, rover and hover matchups were extremely common on flatlands and there was very unclear evidence to suggest which factory was on top. Today, it absolutely feels as though hover is on top.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
Although it's a rather small sample size, this data from high elo, flatland games during the most recent patch does support the theory of hover dominance:
|
3 |
Although it's a rather small sample size, this data from high elo, flatland games during the most recent patch does support the theory of hover dominance:
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
[img]https://i.imgur.com/wBSylXu.png[/img]
|
5 |
[img]https://i.imgur.com/wBSylXu.png[/img]
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
To be clear, hover have 20 wins over rovers 11. If you look at losses, Hover shows itself to be a very safe choice; 6 losses. 20-6 ratio is very safe.
|
7 |
To be clear, hover have 20 wins over rovers 11. If you look at losses, Hover shows itself to be a very safe choice; 6 losses. 20-6 ratio is very safe.
|
| 8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 9 |
If we then remove the flatlands filter...
|
9 |
If we then remove the flatlands filter...
|
| 10 |
\n
|
10 |
\n
|
| 11 |
[img]https://i.imgur.com/xHujE0z.png[/img]
|
11 |
[img]https://i.imgur.com/xHujE0z.png[/img]
|
| 12 |
\n
|
12 |
\n
|
| 13 |
It's clear to see that the trend of hover being a safe pick continues, with it's loss rate much lower ranked than it's win rate. It's important to look at the size of those chunks. In this example, poor tanks is an incredibly risky pick with 8 wins and 18 losses.
|
13 |
It's clear to see that the trend of hover being a safe pick continues, with it's loss rate much lower ranked than it's win rate. It's important to look at the size of those chunks. In this example, poor tanks is an incredibly risky pick with 8 wins and 18 losses.
|
| 14 |
\n
|
14 |
\n
|
| 15 |
Meanwhile, and a little more off-topic to hovers, we can see that shieldbots has become a far safer choice than cloakbots. But apparently I've kicked the shieldbots is OP dead horse to the point where it's no longer a valid opinion to hold.
|
15 |
Meanwhile, and a little more off-topic to hovers, we can see that shieldbots has become a far safer choice than cloakbots. But apparently I've kicked the shieldbots is OP dead horse to the point where it's no longer a valid opinion to hold.
|
| 16 |
\n
|
16 |
\n
|
| 17 |
EDIT: It appears most of October's data is missing from the sample. I'd be very interested to see if the trend continues.
|
17 |
EDIT: It appears most of October's data is missing from the sample. I'd be very interested to see if the trend continues.
|
|
|
18 |
\n
|
|
|
19 |
EDIT #2: Remove ZK version from the filters and you get Octobers data, user error.
|
Ravager and Halberd