Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

u wut banned for wut?

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
10/19/2020 1:29:00 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
Before After
1 [quote]The teamkilling is enough to justify the ban.[/quote] 1 [quote]The teamkilling is enough to justify the ban.[/quote]
2 The teamkilling justifies the ban in as of itself but the context contributes to why it is a three day ban rather than potentially less. I do not see a reason to provide less context rather than more. 2 The teamkilling justifies the ban in as of itself but the context contributes to why it is a three day ban rather than potentially less. I do not see a reason to provide less context rather than more.
3 \n 3 \n
4 [quote]exactly those statements are what makes it look like despotism.[/quote] 4 [quote]exactly those statements are what makes it look like despotism.[/quote]
5 The highest level of arbitration in this community is, in fact, the best judgement of the admins and the moderation team. If you are determined to describe that as "despotism" then have at it I suppose. 5 The highest level of arbitration in this community is, in fact, the best judgement of the admins and the moderation team. If you are determined to describe that as "despotism" then have at it I suppose.
6 \n 6 \n
7 To be more explicit, I have no reason to think based on that description that @weiweiwtf is not playing to the best of their abilities. @patrician is a little murkier but I have not to date witnessed myself or had referred to me any particularly disrespectful play from them. 7 To be more explicit, I have no reason to think based on that description that @weiweiwtf is not playing to the best of their abilities. ( Constructor spam is honestly top-tier if it is done right. . . anybody remember @Svatopluk ?) @patrician is a little murkier but I have not to date witnessed myself or had referred to me any particularly disrespectful play from them.
8 \n 8 \n
9 [quote]wow, czesio played like Firepluk and patrician...[/quote] 9 [quote]wow, czesio played like Firepluk and patrician...[/quote]
10 Despite whatever your opinion might be and whatever my personal views might be, there is a substantial fraction of the community (even if not a majority) that is of the opinion that @Firepluk's style of play is broadly acceptable and that they enjoy playing with and against him. That makes it pretty damn difficult to justify moderator action with respect to his style of play alone, outside of cases where he plays at the most useless end of his range (which doesn't happen *that* often). 10 Despite whatever your opinion might be and whatever my personal views might be, there is a substantial fraction of the community (even if not a majority) that is of the opinion that @Firepluk's style of play is broadly acceptable and that they enjoy playing with and against him. That makes it pretty damn difficult to justify moderator action with respect to his style of play alone, outside of cases where he plays at the most useless end of his range (which doesn't happen *that* often).