1 |
Thing
is,
there
are
very
few
things
that
will
be
vulnerable
to
a
missile
silo
that
are
worth
4k
to
defend.
|
1 |
@Anarchid:
Thing
is,
there
are
very
few
things
that
will
be
vulnerable
to
a
missile
silo
that
are
worth
4k
to
defend.
|
2 |
It's cheaper to build extra anti-nukes than defend one with a funnel...
|
2 |
It's cheaper to build extra anti-nukes than defend one with a funnel...
|
3 |
The only things more expensive than Funnels are Berthas (barely), superweapons and Trinities. Possibly a Singu if it's next to a bunch of expensive stuff...
|
3 |
The only things more expensive than Funnels are Berthas (barely), superweapons and Trinities. Possibly a Singu if it's next to a bunch of expensive stuff...
|
4 |
And in practice these things are normally out of range of a silo, which is near the front happily killing Cerebrus, Artemis, Tremors and Merlins (and a single regular shield is often enough to make this cost inefficient)... Or launching fire at your caretakers in 1v1. Or Shockleying your army and antis (with the Funnelweb shield blocking a single 600 metal Shockley for 4k not making much of a difference).
|
4 |
And in practice these things are normally out of range of a silo, which is near the front happily killing Cerebrus, Artemis, Tremors and Merlins (and a single regular shield is often enough to make this cost inefficient)... Or launching fire at your caretakers in 1v1. Or Shockleying your army and antis (with the Funnelweb shield blocking a single 600 metal Shockley for 4k not making much of a difference).
|
|
|
5 |
\n
|
|
|
6 |
@Anir: If you want to defend your army use Aspis. Far more cost effective, less vulnerable to many things (much harder to arti-down or just walk under) and can actually keep up with your army, unlike a modern Funnelweb.
|