Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Delete my account

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
12/25/2021 12:43:41 AMCZrankSilent_AI before revert after revert
12/25/2021 12:41:31 AMCZrankSilent_AI before revert after revert
12/25/2021 12:40:25 AMCZrankSilent_AI before revert after revert
Before After
1 Merry Christmass ya all! 1 Merry Christmass ya all!
2 @izirayd did not explain his reasons why he wants to quit, so I cannot comment on it. 2 @izirayd did not explain his reasons why he wants to quit, so I cannot comment on it.
3 \n 3 \n
4 However I missed the whole drama with @Godde it seems. Only now I noticed that he wrote some post that mods immediately isolated in a subthread Off topic / Assylum - so that nobody would find it. And they forum blocked him, so I understand his rage. Here is that thread: https://zero-k. info/Forum/Thread/34654 . That post was written in a very angry tone ( kinda understand why mods burried it then) , which I find untypical of @Godde, because he seems like a very peaceful guy ( his forum karma is +1358 / -21, which is much better than anyone else's karma) . 4 However I missed the whole drama with @Godde it seems. Only now I noticed that he wrote some post that mods immediately isolated in a subthread Off topic / Assylum - so that nobody would find it. And they forum blocked him, so I understand his rage. Here is that thread: https://zero-k. info/Forum/Thread/34654 . That post was written in a very angry tone ( kinda understand why mods burried it then - tho I get why Godde has troubles taking Aquanim seriously) , which I find untypical of @Godde, because he seems like a very peaceful guy ( his forum karma is +1358 / -21, which is much better than anyone else's karma) .
5 This post was preceded by an extensive conversation on Discord between @Godde and @Aquanim and other mods (and players) about that FFA drama that most of us have seen. Both @Godde and mods had arguments that make sense. In short, mods think that your ultimate strategy in FFA should be to try to win - otherwise it may not be fun for other players (ie. @Hoppili is not happy if he is targeted - regardless of anything else - by @hedkeaf). @Godde thinks that trying to codify even this "rule" is futile because FFA can be very chaotic. I mean, one can have a grudge from previous FFA on some players and thus he might want a revenge and just go after them. Moreover, everyone has players that he likes more and other players that he likes less and he is gonna attack those he likes less more likely. Also, regarding that @Hoppili vs @hedkeaf drama - yeah, after he eliminated @Hoppili, @hedkeaf wrote in chat smthing like "my work is done", but I spectated multiple other FFAs with @hedkeaf and he is usually extremely aggresive and just goes after one player until he is eliminated, he does little eco/porc, so I do not think him going purely after @Hoppili was out of his character, except for that provocative message. That is just how he plays FFA. Plus, you have new players and players like @Heldenstein, who just makes geometrical structures out of porc in FFA - is Heldenstein trying to win too? Or are we gonna ignore his case because he is not specifically targeting a single player - so should we change the rule from "try to win" to "do not target a single player if it obviously lowers your chances of victory"? Where do we draw the line? FFA has "free" in its name and @Godde makes a sensible point too. It is definitely not a simple discussion. 5 This post was preceded by an extensive conversation on Discord between @Godde and @Aquanim and other mods (and players) about that FFA drama that most of us have seen. Both @Godde and mods had arguments that make sense. In short, mods think that your ultimate strategy in FFA should be to try to win - otherwise it may not be fun for other players (ie. @Hoppili is not happy if he is targeted - regardless of anything else - by @hedkeaf). @Godde thinks that trying to codify even this "rule" is futile because FFA can be very chaotic. I mean, one can have a grudge from previous FFA on some players and thus he might want a revenge and just go after them. Moreover, everyone has players that he likes more and other players that he likes less and he is gonna attack those he likes less more likely. Also, regarding that @Hoppili vs @hedkeaf drama - yeah, after he eliminated @Hoppili, @hedkeaf wrote in chat smthing like "my work is done", but I spectated multiple other FFAs with @hedkeaf and he is usually extremely aggresive and just goes after one player until he is eliminated, he does little eco/porc, so I do not think him going purely after @Hoppili was out of his character, except for that provocative message. That is just how he plays FFA. Plus, you have new players and players like @Heldenstein, who just makes geometrical structures out of porc in FFA - is Heldenstein trying to win too? Or are we gonna ignore his case because he is not specifically targeting a single player - so should we change the rule from "try to win" to "do not target a single player if it obviously lowers your chances of victory"? Where do we draw the line? FFA has "free" in its name and @Godde makes a sensible point too. It is definitely not a simple discussion.