Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Delete my account

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
12/25/2021 11:52:17 AMUSrankLawesome9 before revert after revert
12/25/2021 11:47:40 AMUSrankLawesome9 before revert after revert
Before After
1 Please don't leave! 1 Please don't leave!
2 There is so much fun to be had! 2 There is so much fun to be had!
3 \n 3 \n
4 About the not allowing people to express their opinion, I can see what you mean, although there are some times when a forum thread just devolves into pointless rabble and it is better to close it than leave it open. 4 About the not allowing people to express their opinion, I can see what you mean, although there are some times when a forum thread just devolves into pointless rabble and it is better to close it than leave it open.
5 \n 5 \n
6 Most of the time I do agree with most of the moderators, but I have seen a few times where it didn't make any sense to quiet the people talking, so I see what you mean here. But, how do they know when to stop someone and when to not? I think that it is hard to tell when you should stop someone (obviously if their hacking, or just insulting everyone, stop them), but other than that it is very hard to tell. Maybe they should come up with a system? like with developing the game there is all those sayings, there should be one for moderation, and then maybe it wouldn't be so bad. 6 Most of the time I do agree with most of the moderators, but I have seen a few times where it didn't make any sense to quiet the people talking, so I see what you mean here. But, how do they know when to stop someone and when to not? I think that it is hard to tell when you should stop someone (obviously if their hacking, or just insulting everyone, stop them), but other than that it is very hard to tell. Maybe they should come up with a system? like with developing the game there is all those sayings, there should be one for moderation, and then maybe it wouldn't be so bad.
7 \n 7 \n
8 Also @Silent_AI, I agree with your post a lot, FFA is one of those modes where you can NEVER TELL, like, I thought this one person was going to win, turned out not even close, I won an FFA once and I don't even know how. You can win with the weirdest strategies ever, or with the absolute worst strategies ever but the other person wasn't prepared, etc. In FFA, nothing goes according to plan, and as you said, I don't think there is an easy way to moderate it, in fact it is very hard. 8 Also @Silent_AI, I agree with your post a lot, FFA is one of those modes where you can NEVER TELL, like, I thought this one person was going to win, turned out not even close, I won an FFA once and I don't even know how. You can win with the weirdest strategies ever, or with the absolute worst strategies ever but the other person wasn't prepared, etc. In FFA, nothing goes according to plan, and as you said, I don't think there is an easy way to moderate it, in fact it is very hard.
9 \n
10 Actually look at this post, by @PRO_rANDY, which very accurately explains the way FFA is and should be:
11 \n
12 https://zero-k.info/Forum/Post/246852#246852