1 |
[My
read
on
this
is
that
Det
is
safe
to
exist
at
10%
because
few
things
could
just
burst
down
9k
hp.
So
you
can
keep
fighting
until
10%
and
then
go
back
to
heal.
]
|
1 |
[quote]
My
read
on
this
is
that
Det
is
safe
to
exist
at
10%
because
few
things
could
just
burst
down
9k
hp.
So
you
can
keep
fighting
until
10%
and
then
go
back
to
heal.
[/quote]
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
I'd agree that the statement is true, but it's not what he's saying. He's saying you can use det up to 10% hp remaining, then self D to leave only 20% of its value in reclaim and get a nuclear strike that bypasses anti. The counters I suppose are only stun/domi. Does disarm pause self d? Do transports pause self d?
|
3 |
I'd agree that the statement is true, but it's not what he's saying. He's saying you can use det up to 10% hp remaining, then self D to leave only 20% of its value in reclaim and get a nuclear strike that bypasses anti. The counters I suppose are only stun/domi. Does disarm pause self d? Do transports pause self d?
|
4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
5 |
Luckily, being low hp also means being more vulnerable to status effects. I don't think the burst 9k of health matters at all if the conext involves a self d det since it would die either way. In fact it's the opposite. If you could burst that 10% det you could get a wreck instead of debris.
|
5 |
Luckily, being low hp also means being more vulnerable to status effects. I don't think the burst 9k of health matters at all if the conext involves a self d det since it would die either way. In fact it's the opposite. If you could burst that 10% det you could get a wreck instead of debris.
|
6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
7 |
What if I were to suggest that selfd generates a wreck if hp is below a threshold? I'm not saying that should be implemented or that's it's even a good idea, but it's what I think is in line with his statement.
|
7 |
What if I were to suggest that selfd generates a wreck if hp is below a threshold? I'm not saying that should be implemented or that's it's even a good idea, but it's what I think is in line with his statement.
|