Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Game mode / ladder disambiguation

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
7/18/2022 11:02:53 AMGBrankPRO_Dregs before revert after revert
Before After
1 [q]How exactly am I supposed to judge my teammates capability without an assigned rating? An important part of team games, that you personally do not participate in, is that you need to know how well your players are distributed and who to assist.[/q] 1 [q]How exactly am I supposed to judge my teammates capability without an assigned rating? An important part of team games, that you personally do not participate in, is that you need to know how well your players are distributed and who to assist.[/q]
2 \n 2 \n
3 Would it matter in an environment that was by definition, casual? If you are playing ranked teams, all the same information will be available to you. 3 Would it matter in an environment that was by definition, casual? If you are playing ranked teams, all the same information will be available to you. Infact, I'm not sure where I specified that any information would be missing to you in either mode.
4 \n 4 \n
5 [q]There's nothing inherently more competitive about matchmade 1v1s than large public team games, both have the same objective of victory and use the same algorithm for team compositions.[/q] 5 [q]There's nothing inherently more competitive about matchmade 1v1s than large public team games, both have the same objective of victory and use the same algorithm for team compositions.[/q]
6 \n 6 \n
7 Thank you for making my point for me from a different angle. If 1v1 is no more competitive than large public team games, this can equally prove that team games are indeed competitive and should be labelled ranked as such. 7 Thank you for making my point for me from a different angle. If 1v1 is no more competitive than large public team games, this can equally prove that team games are indeed competitive and should be labelled ranked as such.
8 \n 8 \n
9 [q]1. No player hosted games contribute to any rating. Only games hosted by official hosts can affect rating. There's no shortage of official hosts. This will prevent low effort abuse that has been occurring.[/q] 9 [q]1. No player hosted games contribute to any rating. Only games hosted by official hosts can affect rating. There's no shortage of official hosts. This will prevent low effort abuse that has been occurring.[/q]
10 \n 10 \n
11 Agree. 11 Agree.
12 \n 12 \n
13 [q]2. FFA, 1v1 and Teams (any size) will be the new ladders, where there will be absolutely no influence of ratings from one ladder on the other ladder.[/q] 13 [q]2. FFA, 1v1 and Teams (any size) will be the new ladders, where there will be absolutely no influence of ratings from one ladder on the other ladder.[/q]
14 \n 14 \n
15 Agree, but not low-hanging fruit. Can logically come after the changes in my OP. 15 Agree, but not low-hanging fruit. Can logically come after the changes in my OP.
16 \n 16 \n
17 [q]3. Rating rewards such as badge color will be awarded equally for any of the 3 ladders, with highest achievement having display priority.[/q] 17 [q]3. Rating rewards such as badge color will be awarded equally for any of the 3 ladders, with highest achievement having display priority.[/q]
18 \n 18 \n
19 I like the idea of this but not psychic enough to know what you're thinking of. Tell me more? 19 I like the idea of this but not psychic enough to know what you're thinking of. Tell me more?