| 1 |
@Skrid really? Your last two posts are just so offensively disingenuous. It takes some pretty poor comprehension or willful misreading to get to your post.
|
1 |
@Skrid really? Your last two posts are just so offensively disingenuous. It takes some pretty poor comprehension or willful misreading to get to your post.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
The exchange you quote starts with @Lightzerve saying:
|
3 |
The exchange you quote starts with @Lightzerve saying:
|
| 4 |
[q]@katastrophe bro why would I give up my free thought. I don't want to be a vegetable like you guys :/ [/q]
|
4 |
[q]@katastrophe bro why would I give up my free thought. I don't want to be a vegetable like you guys :/ [/q]
|
| 5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
| 6 |
@katastrophe responds and @Lightzerve follows up with:
|
6 |
@katastrophe responds and @Lightzerve follows up with:
|
| 7 |
[q]We both believe in the idea of freedom of expression on this forum. We're also against bimbo moderation. Most times we share an opinion it's on forum posts regarding these topics.[/q]
|
7 |
[q]We both believe in the idea of freedom of expression on this forum. We're also against bimbo moderation. Most times we share an opinion it's on forum posts regarding these topics.[/q]
|
| 8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 9 |
So it seems like @Lightzerve has a double standard. He says that when other people agree they are vegetables, but when he agrees with someone they are both just expressing a belief in the same idea.
|
9 |
So it seems like @Lightzerve has a double standard. He says that when other people agree they are vegetables, but when he agrees with someone they are both just expressing a belief in the same idea.
|
| 10 |
\n
|
10 |
\n
|
| 11 |
@Aquanim
points
out
this
double
standard
via
the
device
of
restating
what
someone
just
said
as
a
question
as
to
whether
they
really
believe
it
(
this
can
be
helpful
as
miscommunication
is
common,
and
people
can
not
realise
what
others
think
they
meant)
.
|
11 |
@Aquanim
points
out
this
double
standard
via
the
device
of
restating
what
someone
just
said
as
a
question
about
whether
they
really
believe
it
(
this
can
be
helpful
as
miscommunication
is
common,
and
people
can
not
realise
what
others
think
they
meant)
.
|
| 12 |
[q]So when you agree with Skrid you "both believe in [an] idea" but when other people agree with each other they are "vegetable(s)"? [/q]
|
12 |
[q]So when you agree with Skrid you "both believe in [an] idea" but when other people agree with each other they are "vegetable(s)"? [/q]
|
| 13 |
\n
|
13 |
\n
|
| 14 |
Then you, @Skrid, come in and interpret this as harassment. It takes a lot of questionable steps to reach that interpretation. The sentence is a comment about what @Lightzerve just said, not what you have said. Someone agreeing with you doesn't directly cast you in a bad light. What really gets me is how you left the question mark off the end of the quote. But that doesn't even make it harassment! It looks like you wanted to manufacture a quote where @Aquanim calls you a vegetable, but you are "Skrid" in the quote, not "other people"!
|
14 |
Then you, @Skrid, come in and interpret this as harassment. It takes a lot of questionable steps to reach that interpretation. The sentence is a comment about what @Lightzerve just said, not what you have said. Someone agreeing with you doesn't directly cast you in a bad light. What really gets me is how you left the question mark off the end of the quote. But that doesn't even make it harassment! It looks like you wanted to manufacture a quote where @Aquanim calls you a vegetable, but you are "Skrid" in the quote, not "other people"!
|
| 15 |
\n
|
15 |
\n
|
| 16 |
But what else is there? Is being called "both believe in [an] idea" harassment? I think you meant
|
16 |
But what else is there? Is being called "both believe in [an] idea" harassment? I think you meant
|
| 17 |
[q]Enough with the ad hominems, man. [/q]
|
17 |
[q]Enough with the ad hominems, man. [/q]
|
| 18 |
to refer to the word vegetable.
|
18 |
to refer to the word vegetable.
|
| 19 |
\n
|
19 |
\n
|
| 20 |
Do you really think @Aquanim called you a vegetable? I doubt it. You've had an inexplicable beef with moderation (specifically @Aquanim) for a while now. You left off the question mark in your quote. I think you're just pulling out every dirty trick you can think of to manufacture drama. The misquote [i]doesn't even work[/i]. If you think you're fighting some sort of fight for better moderation, then you are sorely mistaken.
|
20 |
Do you really think @Aquanim called you a vegetable? I doubt it. You've had an inexplicable beef with moderation (specifically @Aquanim) for a while now. You left off the question mark in your quote. I think you're just pulling out every dirty trick you can think of to manufacture drama. The misquote [i]doesn't even work[/i]. If you think you're fighting some sort of fight for better moderation, then you are sorely mistaken.
|
| 21 |
\n
|
21 |
\n
|
| 22 |
Do you want to remain on this forum? A lot of what you talk about is about ZK, comments on the game. But if you're willing to play this dirty with words, to so blatantly misinterpret what was said, then you are going to be ejected. There isn't any reason for the rest of us to put up with this.
|
22 |
Do you want to remain on this forum? A lot of what you talk about is about ZK, comments on the game. But if you're willing to play this dirty with words, to so blatantly misinterpret what was said, then you are going to be ejected. There isn't any reason for the rest of us to put up with this.
|
| 23 |
\n
|
23 |
\n
|
| 24 |
This goes for you too @Lightzerve, but you've progressed far further than @Skrid and I don't recall a time when you didn't just post nonsense in attempts to enrage or stir up drama.
|
24 |
This goes for you too @Lightzerve, but you've progressed far further than @Skrid and I don't recall a time when you didn't just post nonsense in attempts to enrage or stir up drama.
|
Think for yourself