| 1 |
@Forever,
|
1 |
@Forever,
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
1. since you already say: [q] There are already too many stupid people in our world today, and it has nothing to do with brain matter, but with stupid choices based on feelings without any rationale. [/q] , then you surely can explain the difference between your demand towards Aquanim and the (still hypothetical at this point) demand to take away the imperial japanese flag in a computer-game. Because there is a difference, and ratio tells us to treat different things different.
|
3 |
1. since you already say: [q] There are already too many stupid people in our world today, and it has nothing to do with brain matter, but with stupid choices based on feelings without any rationale. [/q] , then you surely can explain the difference between your demand towards Aquanim and the (still hypothetical at this point) demand to take away the imperial japanese flag in a computer-game. Because there is a difference, and ratio tells us to treat different things different.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
2. Lets say, we buff Krow-health by 50, would it be a good argument against the buff to say: "If people keep giving Krow more health, it will be totally op." In genral, those arguments are not very valid for the issue itself, that being the 50-hp-buff in this example.
|
5 |
2. Lets say, we buff Krow-health by 50, would it be a good argument against the buff to say: "If people keep giving Krow more health, it will be totally op." In genral, those arguments are not very valid for the issue itself, that being the 50-hp-buff in this example.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
3.
The
rational
conclusion
one
would
come
to
in
case
of
the
main
topic
is
that
it
does
not
affect
us
in
any
way,
exept
if
one
might
be
a
genuine
japanese
imperialist.
Given
that,
do
I
need
to
point
out
the
irony
of
an
irrational,
emotionaly
driven
rant
about
"stupid
choices
based
on
feelings
without
any
rationale"?
|
7 |
3.
The
rational
conclusion
one
would
come
to
in
case
of
the
main
topic
is
that
it
does
not
affect
us
in
any
way,
exept
if
one
might
be
a
genuine
japanese
imperialist.
Given
that,
do
I
need
to
point
out
the
irony
of
an
irrational,
emotionaly
driven
rant
about
"stupid
choices
based
on
feelings
without
any
rationale"?
ESPECIALLY
when
the
offense
was
based
on
pure
assumption:
|
|
|
8 |
[q] maybe because "kamikaze" could be seen as "offensive"? [/q]
|
|
|
9 |
which seems to have been disproven by @dyth68.
|
B1466778 6 on Ravaged_v2 (Multiplayer)