Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

B1466778 6 on Ravaged_v2 (Multiplayer)

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
10/5/2022 10:01:15 PMDErankkatastrophe before revert after revert
Before After
1 So, the difference between your case and the case about the flag is that you demand something clearly humiliating to others, while I do not see how the flag-thing would scratch you in any way. 1 So, the difference between your case and the case about the flag is that you demand something clearly humiliating to others, while I do not see how the flag-thing would scratch you in any way.
2 \n
3 @malric @Lawesome9
4 I do definitely share your points. What I would like to add is that it is necessary to put thought into the specific issues. This has already been pointed out:
5 [q] And in a lot of situations, what one group of people finds "normal" is genuinely offensive to somebody else, for reasons that make sense if you're capable of putting yourself in their shoes for a minute - which a lot of people seem not to be capable of. [/q]
6 \n
7 I would very well understand if someone whos relatives were forced to commit suicide in WWII would find the symbol tasteless. This community has also banned Hakenkreuz-maps for example. Putting myself in the shoes of @Forever, I can only see 2 possibilities
8 for his claim: Either you genuinely believe you are entitled to mandatory be called master, which would point to some delusional narcicism, or you are just pulling some desperate, ironic example for what you think goes too far out of your butt. I am pretty sure we have the second option here. In this regard, @Forever has done a good job in demonstrating what kind of people should not be taken too seriously.
9 \n
10 I also share @Malrics point about there being too much discussion, but it is very enlightning to look (not just in this thread) who actually started the discussion. This thread could have been just @Lawesome9 asking and someone else that actually knows what is going on answering and that would have been it. But someone was obviously offended by the possibility that others might be offended by something without knowledge what was going on, without putting themselves into the shoes of others and without good arguments for the specific subject of the thread. This is how we end up here.
11 \n