Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Vote to split Teams - All Welcome into 2 smaller teams rooms?

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
4/16/2023 3:17:35 AMAUrankAdminGoogleFrog before revert after revert
Before After
1 @malric just told you, but you focused on the last line of his post rather than the body. 1 @malric just told you, but you focused on the last line of his post rather than the body.
2 [q]The way I see it: assume we don't have 24h per day 64 players online (probably with time zones it will happen). At some point 32 players will start host one. The 33rd player comes and joins as a spec. He might need to wait for 30-40 minutes (large games tend to take longer). The 34th players comes and joins as a spec (and so on). 20 minutes have passed and there are 10 specs. What do you think will happen now? Will all 10 players wait until there are 32 waiting? Or some will get bored and leave? If some get bored and leave you will NOT reach the 2 hosts with 32 players.. If you think players will join fast enough to reach a large number of specs that can start a game... how will that happen practically? I rarely see people "moving to a new host".[/q] 2 [q]The way I see it: assume we don't have 24h per day 64 players online (probably with time zones it will happen). At some point 32 players will start host one. The 33rd player comes and joins as a spec. He might need to wait for 30-40 minutes (large games tend to take longer). The 34th players comes and joins as a spec (and so on). 20 minutes have passed and there are 10 specs. What do you think will happen now? Will all 10 players wait until there are 32 waiting? Or some will get bored and leave? If some get bored and leave you will NOT reach the 2 hosts with 32 players.. If you think players will join fast enough to reach a large number of specs that can start a game... how will that happen practically? I rarely see people "moving to a new host".[/q]
3 \n 3 \n
4 @katastrophe explained this a week ago. 4 @katastrophe explained this a week ago.
5 [q]first: it`s a risk to open your own room and hope for other people to join if you want to play a game NOW. Players that are in the waiting-list have to give up their spot to see the complete state of another room. I see some potential improvement here: If one was able to see how long a game has been going or how long the waiting-list in another room is without leaving your current room, then it is a lot less unattractive to do so.[/q] 5 [q]first: it`s a risk to open your own room and hope for other people to join if you want to play a game NOW. Players that are in the waiting-list have to give up their spot to see the complete state of another room. I see some potential improvement here: If one was able to see how long a game has been going or how long the waiting-list in another room is without leaving your current room, then it is a lot less unattractive to do so.[/q]
6 \n 6 \n
7 @Lu5ck, you're going to at least try switching to saying why you don't understand people's explanations, rather than just repeatedly demanding then ignoring explanations. 7 @Lu5ck, you're going to at least try switching to saying why you don't understand people's explanations, rather than just repeatedly demanding that they explain then ignoring the response.