1 |
Simultaneously, yes.
|
1 |
Simultaneously, yes.
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
But we're talking about shield sharing. I took the above post to mean that if you shoot one eos, wait, shoot an eos, wait, shoot an eos... then shield sharing would have one aegis fill the other and take itself down below 3.5k.
|
3 |
But we're talking about shield sharing. I took the above post to mean that if you shoot one eos, wait, shoot an eos, wait, shoot an eos... then shield sharing would have one aegis fill the other and take itself down below 3.5k.
|
4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
5 |
I
don't
think
I've
ever
seen
that
happen.
If
there
are
two
aegis
near
a
cerb,
they
usually
block
2
eos'
and
then
even
if
the
third
one
makes
it
through,
it
doesn't
kill
the
cerb.
That
is
of
course
if
the
shields
reach
far
enough
to
mitigate
the
AOE.
|
5 |
I
don't
think
I've
ever
seen
that
happen.
If
there
are
two
aegis
near
a
cerb,
they
usually
block
2
eos
and
then
even
if
the
third
one
makes
it
through,
it
doesn't
kill
the
cerb.
That
is
of
course
if
the
shields
reach
far
enough
to
mitigate
the
AOE.
|
6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
7 |
EDIT:
|
7 |
EDIT:
|
8 |
And that's a steel man of this post:
|
8 |
And that's a steel man of this post:
|
9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
10 |
[q]You could have two different players shielding a Cerberus for example, and 1 Eos would hit the first players shield, draining it, and then the second would impact on the second players shield, leaving only the last Eos to actually hit the Cerberus.[/q]
|
10 |
[q]You could have two different players shielding a Cerberus for example, and 1 Eos would hit the first players shield, draining it, and then the second would impact on the second players shield, leaving only the last Eos to actually hit the Cerberus.[/q]
|
11 |
\n
|
11 |
\n
|
12 |
Because if the attacker just shot 3 eos simultaneously at 2 aegis, I don't see how shield sharing even comes into play at all.
|
12 |
Because if the attacker just shot 3 eos simultaneously at 2 aegis, I don't see how shield sharing even comes into play at all.
|
13 |
\n
|
13 |
\n
|