Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Playing On

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
9/9/2012 5:21:05 PMGBrankDroopyTheDog before revert after revert
9/9/2012 5:19:39 PMGBrankDroopyTheDog before revert after revert
Before After
1 TBH that can work both ways, people so focussed on their part of the battlefield that they only see their own losses will call for a resign vote without realising that the other team has been playing agressive whilst theirs has been playing e-farmer and they actually have the bigger economy, even with less mex. 1 TBH that can work both ways, people so focussed on their part of the battlefield that they only see their own losses will call for a resign vote without realising that the other team has been playing agressive whilst theirs has been playing e-farmer and they actually have the bigger economy, even with less mex.
2 \n 2 \n
3 Plus there's a big difference between absolutely certain to lose and having less than a 50:50 chance. Some people resign at the sign of the slightest advantage to the opponent, some people like to play untill even their slimest chance of winning is gone. 3 Plus there's a big difference between absolutely certain to lose and having less than a 50:50 chance. Some people resign at the sign of the slightest advantage to the opponent, some people like to play untill even their slimmest chance of winning is gone.