| 1 |
Ivica, you might wanna check the pipe, cause there isn't just tobacco in there ;)
|
1 |
Ivica, you might wanna check the pipe, cause there isn't just tobacco in there ;)
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
The notalobby deves never agreed to releases sources, and said from the beginning that it was closed source. No amount of butthurt is going to change the facts.
|
3 |
The notalobby deves never agreed to releases sources, and said from the beginning that it was closed source. No amount of butthurt is going to change the facts.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
There is nothing shady about the notalobby devs. They prefer to keep their source closed and that is perfectly within their right.
|
5 |
There is nothing shady about the notalobby devs. They prefer to keep their source closed and that is perfectly within their right.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
I would be willing to bet that you probably don't even know how notalobby infringes upon the spring license... Well allow me to enlighten you. Spring has this thing called unitsync. Think of unitsync as a gateway into spring. It allows you to see datadirectories and all kinds of cool stuff.
|
7 |
I would be willing to bet that you probably don't even know how notalobby infringes upon the spring license... Well allow me to enlighten you. Spring has this thing called unitsync. Think of unitsync as a gateway into spring. It allows you to see datadirectories and all kinds of cool stuff.
|
| 8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 9 |
Now, because notalobby relied on unitsync for spring to pass along information, this means that because unitsync/spring is under a GPL license, anything that links to it must also be GPL. So, by circumventing unitsync, notalobby is no longer in violation of spring's license.
|
9 |
Now, because notalobby relied on unitsync for spring to pass along information, this means that because unitsync/spring is under a GPL license, anything that links to it must also be GPL. So, by circumventing unitsync, notalobby is no longer in violation of spring's license.
|
| 10 |
\n
|
10 |
\n
|
| 11 |
ZKLobby actually bypasses unitsync altogether (It's own implementation). Does that make Licho shady?
|
11 |
ZKLobby actually bypasses unitsync altogether (It's own implementation). Does that make Licho shady?
|
| 12 |
\n
|
12 |
\n
|
| 13 |
Don't smear other developers when you don't actually understand what is going on (especially when you yourself are a notalobby user...).
|
13 |
Don't smear other developers when you don't actually understand what is going on (especially when you yourself are a notalobby user...).
|
|
|
14 |
\n
|
|
|
15 |
Edit: Also, you are crazy. SL doesn't have a memory leak.
|
How to Zero-k on Linux