Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Gravity as source of energy?

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
9/8/2013 7:27:02 PMNLrank[DE]Rick before revert after revert
Before After
1 Fusion is nice and all but it wont be commercial until ~2050. Current fusion reactors are used for experiments rather than energy production. They dont produce much energy yet. 1 Fusion is nice and all but it wont be commercial until ~2050. Current fusion reactors are used for experiments rather than energy production. They dont produce much energy yet.
2 \n 2 \n
3 From what i know it has to do with the size of the torus once you go past a certain diameter fusion efficiency rises high enough so that it will actualy produce more energy than it consumes 3 From what i know it has to do with the size of the torus once you go past a certain diameter fusion efficiency rises high enough so that it will actualy produce more energy than it consumes. Guess it has to do with volume and area.