I think that is a pretty poor take on this game, and in any event I do not think the community is enriched by that post.

I think best thing is to use report with something very specific "player X started detriment, was asked to stop, he told everybody he plays as he wants".

In time such reports will accumulate and a decision can be taken.

Even if a particular forum post is correct from your point of view (don't know, did not look at the game) it creates a bad atmosphere (people will react/feel pressured/etc.). I definitely would not want all complaints about various trolls out in the open (more than they occasionally get anyhow).

I admit I didn't watch the entire game but my impression from the first half or so is that:
- gnomkakraft was alone south-west, could hardly have pushed across the water on their own, and didn't make it trivially easy for the higher-rated east players they were opposing to take their land; many higher-rated players would have played more aggressively and found worse results
- Leopard_33 was playing air against a considerably higher rated air opponent and shot down some bombers without losing their entire fighter force

so unless they got into outright teamkilling or something in the second half, which I assume would have been reported, I don't see how any of these even begins to approach modactionability.

Felt I should answer the question, but yes I don't see any need for this thread to go any further.