Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   
Title: [A] Palladium (Event, 2k+ rating)
Host: Nobody
Game version: Zero-K v1.7.11.4
Engine version: 104.0.1-1435-g79d77ca
Started: 18 days ago
Duration: 49 minutes
Players: 8
Bots: False
Mission: False
Watch Replay Now
Manual download

Team 1
Chance of victory: 52.8%

USrankAdminJasper
ZArankRadavvadra
CArankPetTurtle
SKrankTinySpider
Team 2
Chance of victory: 47.2%

DErankManu12
EErankNorthChileanG
GBrankbombman
FIrankHighrule1

Show winners



Preview
Filter:    Player:  
Page of 2 (26 records)
sort
18 days ago
Much work here. Tiny was spamming caretakers and Pet was porked up hard.
+0 / -0

18 days ago
that game was won, but then... bombmans pala was no longer besides my army and got killed by ulti...

still mad
+0 / -0
18 days ago
41k reclaim :D
+0 / -0
17 days ago
I dgun pala and bombed 4 Merlin's
+2 / -0

17 days ago
manu maybe your army wanst next to pala anymore
+0 / -0

17 days ago
maybe, but in my thought process i had to pressure arty and push as warriors kinda suck as protection with barely any health and expected pala to follow cover.
+0 / -0
17 days ago
The only arty we had was Cerberus and that was far away.
+0 / -0
15 days ago
Casted on Youtube
+3 / -0
15 days ago
watch scorpion 39:50, kinda sad it was missed
+0 / -0
15 days ago
ROrankForever you repeat yourself a lot in the video. Might want to re-watch your recording and keep a list of words you keep reusing too much ("interesting", "noticed" etc.), you also mix up unit names, even at end you say there were several paladins killed :D

You missed a lot of game deciding battles because you didn't pause when zooming in on something and explaining it. Didn't even notice 6 lances getting destroyed one after another. Seems you haven't decided who your target audience is, spread all over the place. You can't really analyze games in depth if you aren't even aware of new unit mechanics (conjurer having cloak field now) and 1h long video will not capture a newbies attention since it's not very engaging. Might try some editing/fast forwarding with focus on high unit value exchanges which really are the only interesting parts of games for a viewer.

Meant as advice and not insult, I want to see more videos and you're the only one making them afaik so I want them to get better.
+1 / -0
15 days ago
SKrankTinySpider, to be honest, I almost fell asleep yesterday during the recording so I was kinda exhausted :D. I have also noticed that I repeat myself over and over again and that's something that I want to improve.

Any feedback is welcomed and I have no bad feelings receiving it. I am tempted to make the video and then highlight the important aspects of the match or even make an intro short video that shows important aspects of the game.
+0 / -0

15 days ago
just rewatched the game and i still get mad

quote:
The only arty we had was Cerberus and that was far away.

there were 10 Impalers

quote:
manu maybe your army wanst next to pala anymore

I actually spotted the ulti 2 seconds before it could attack with a Halbert... the pala died due to retreating into ulti because of attack move...


Early game sucked because i had no los for lance

Midgame sucked because units were suicided everywhere

Lategame sucked because we never had assault units to deal the killing blow or just get more free space for arty to deal damage. Halberts were decent but they do not work as an assault against defence.

PS: FIrankHighrule1 pls never ever spam cloaked reavers as they are way too fragile and die to a single faraday. If at any point of the game one of these 3 reaver balls were Knights they could have pushed through with ease.

+1 / -0

14 days ago
well to be fair, cloaked reavers can be very effective
+0 / -0
In regards to what DErankManu12 said to FIrankHighrule1 towards cloaked reavers.

I agree that they are too squishy to be used in a cloaked state. Once discovered they take to much dmg in comparison to other units :D. A Knight would have been more effective
+0 / -0
that makes no sense. uncloaked reavers don´t take less damage :)

and yes, knight would have been better... Knight on the other hand have abysmal dps.
+0 / -0
Meh, it was a terrible game. I should've fac switched rather than kept up with relatively useless Reaver balls after failing to push in top left, Chilean got obsessed with top left well after that area had been fortified and tried to push against a Juggle without a single Racketeer, bombman's three Merlins weren't even microed and died for no reason, Paladin stopped pushing and died to an Ultimatum. And this is really just the tip of the iceberg.

So many bad plays, awful decisions and close to zero team synergy.
+2 / -0

14 days ago
FIrankHighrule1 sums up what I didn´t dare to say...
+0 / -0
14 days ago
It's easy to play captain hindsight when you're watching a replay and don't have to spread your attention around.
+0 / -0
'Hindsight' my ass. DErankManu12 was playing an unacceptable amount of time pretty much solo considering this was a 'high elo' - game. Handpicked, cream of the crop gold tier players would've performed better than these three stooges.

Since I was a part of the issue I don't feel at ease going into all the details, but if there were imaginary expectations on level of play based on rank, those were absolutely not met here. Of course I have my own excuses, but that doesn't change the fact that we lost this game because three of us made serious mistakes unbecoming of a high level player.
+1 / -1
14 days ago
smells cooked in here
+0 / -0
Page of 2 (26 records)