THEY BUILT THE PYRAMIDS LIKE THIS

I fail to see the lobster in this

Brah.

https://www.youtube.com/brienfoerster



latin pyramid is
pyr a mid

fire inside... matches findings of brein foerster of this ting was some sort of reactor in predynastic times

mojjj why are you shitting on the message? the original researcher of those stuff is Brien Foerster, he made books. he actually went there. hes on every conference about the subject, yet you muddy the water with some bs ai text to speech nonsense word salad channel. your channel uses original Brein's footage. Brein Forester on his channel does interviews with people who are really into it like real stone people experts of today. Or other predynastic historians.

it happened. first you wanted to divert the traffic, then you deliberately changed your entry to further falsify and muddy the water. its in the changelogs: http://zero-k.info/PostHistory/Index/257829

may we know why?


The only reliable guy who been there, measured it left right and centre with real contemporary expers is Brein Foerster.
https://www.youtube.com/brienfoerster

yes. thats the exact question i ask, why so offensive towards real content. you deliberately chose to distort it. its in the changelogs.

does your "expert" do this?


or this?


or did he wrote a book or couple?


i did some math for the guy a few years back... he had troube with assesing size of the sawblades used, simple math formula to get it together... nothing fancy...

For how much longer do we have to endure this?

Why don't you fill in the actual values? And why do you think its "crazy" to create a huge circle? Like a millstone? Do you believe it requires alien tech to carve millstones?

quote: may we know why?

Because it is possible to change your opinion in the face of new information. I changed my post because I don`t care about your math, but the conclusions you get out of them.

quote: fire inside... matches findings of brein foerster of this ting was some sort of reactor in predynastic times

No. It MAY HAVE BEEN.

[q]
latin pyramid is
pyr a mid

No, in latin that would be "ignis in medio".

quote: Or other predynastic historians.

Exept that this is archeology. Historians deal with written sources like this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow_Mathematical_Papyrus

katastrophe i don't work for you, but if you're genuinely interested its in the materials presented of his books and conferences.

about pyr a mid, youre right, its greek not latin.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pyr-

but still its same Mediterranean cultural origin.

mojjj can you post couple of those conferences or books of your expert, i have trouble finding them.

Graham Hancock is a genius. He figured out that if you just go far enough back in time you can basically write whatever science fiction you want and call it archaeology. No one can prove you wrong because no one can really say what did or didn't happen 10,000 years ago. Now everyone's copying his method, it's great.

[...] "sceptical" community that youre part of [...]

That group is called "historians with academic degree".

quote: If you want to make a useful post, explain exactly why Foersters hypothesis about the construction of pyramids is more LIKELY to be true than the hypothesis of Purcell.

And this is how we work. I did nothing else than to ask the questions I ask all sources. How unfair.