Hightops3 map - Zero-K

sort
[1uP]Willk 10 years ago This map is cool, but I dunno about balance at least with Horizontal start boxes. SW/NE looks more balanced but yea, the assymeticalness makes even that a bit wonky. +0 / -0
Orfelius 10 years ago 1. Is compleatly assymetrical. 2. Has ugly texture with fake shadows drawn on the diffuse (it is a very bad map practice) 3. The diffrences between height are too tbh way to big for i think ANY spring game. So i woould not say this map is "cool" in regards of both gameplay and visuals. +1 / -0
Skasi 10 years ago What about corners? Northwest vs Southeast. Looking at the metalmap that's how it's supposed to be played. +0 / -0
[1uP]Willk 10 years ago I think NE vs. SW makes more sense. The problem with the the way you said Skasi is SE has early access to the extra 2.4 peak early. +0 / -0
Skasi 10 years ago Yours would give northeast MUCH more high ground. The two starting metal spots would make rushing to mid a must. Anyway, check out all the metal spots. Theres a LOT of "symmetry". +0 / -0
Aquanim 10 years ago SE is quite a bit closer to most of their metal spots though. This map just seems inherently imbalanced. +0 / -0
GoogleFrog 10 years ago It would need a remake regardless due to the baked shadows. +0 / -0
Pxtl 10 years ago Probably designed for a game where spiders and jumper cons aren't availabe to quickly scale the cliff. The pathed distance from spawn to the high 3-clusters is probably similar for bots from both start points, but spiders and jumpies would ruin it. Skip it. +0 / -0
[1uP]Willk 10 years ago Yea, in the end, someone voted it in, and when I speced it, I could see off the start one side had a big advantage over the other. It's a skip +0 / -0

Hightops3

PLAY ON THIS MAP

Last battles