Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Censored maps

12 posts, 829 views
Filter:    Player:  
sort
Admins in their infinite wisdom still ban maps such as much loved

[15:00] rooks[vegan]: !map Small Supreme Battlefield V2
[15:00] Nightwatch The map Small Supreme Battlefield V2 http://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/7770 is not available on this autohost. Play it in a player hosted battle.

is there a real reason why to push shit maps that bleed game rooms of players since noone wants to play them, and destroy community even further? did someone actually approached any of admins and requested that ban to happen?

even the one that is in zk loading screen is banned. the yellow one with those cool egyptian obelisks and cloud surroundings, its not even listed anymore.

is there a specyfic reason why you hate players that much to push shit maps, and stalin-vanish liked maps, or is it some cop-reasoning behind it, as in wear seatbelt for your safety or i will give you a ticket from my motocycle?

you know that this is opensource peer project, where everyone can chip in, so why all of the sudden such bs flood? this crap happend in only last 3-4 years... and its just messing up zk.. did anyone actually approached any of admins and said, we want map vote spam after any battle with crap map sellection that noone plays instead of ie. 2 most played, and 2 most random obscure.

if you ever plan to go to real world you wouldnt last a week as community guys, since most studios would fire you guys for doing disservice to the brand... you were cool once and now talking to you is like talking to a cop or someone from some horror story of a clueless consultant:
http://www.dadhacker.com/blog/?p=2550
+1 / -1

5 years ago
For the record a fairly large number of maps were featured recently.

quote:
The map Small Supreme Battlefield V2 http://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/7770 is not available on this autohost. Play it in a player hosted battle.

There were some requests to feature Tangerine and increasing the density of "divided-sea maps which tend to play poorly unless many skilled players are present to contest all of the divided map domains" didn't seem like a great idea. We held a poll to decide between Tangerine and SSB and Tangerine won by a substantial margin.

quote:
even the one that is in zk loading screen is banned. the yellow one with those cool egyptian obelisks and cloud surroundings, its not even listed anymore.

As per the most recent maintainer of Seth's Ravine,

"I don't think it's quite feature-ready yet due to emergent problems with the unreclaimable features."

I expect the admins would quite happily feature a version of Seth's Ravine which did not have technical issues.
+0 / -0
Yea. you see. the problem is that its what you say. And what you say is not what people want. People want to play seth ravine and small supreme. you can put whatever reasoning you want, do any backstory to it, any technicality, but fact remains that youre authoritatively ban maps that people like. and that ban bleeds game rooms.

its not like putting them out there is pushing something on someone, still they need to be voted in by players, not by admins, so maybe you guys will cut out that bs and let people play what they like, if they will agree on it?

until you mentioned it, i dont remember anyone saying "lets ban seth ravine because i cant res some feature"... and that fix is like 3 lines of code specyfing features metal content in map description... so really...

you guys would be so fired by any gamedev studio for this...
+1 / -0
As admins our primary motivation is to show Zero-K in a good light, so as to attract a playerbase of people whom we would like to play with. Allowing people to inadvertently shoot themselves in the foot by picking a buggy map which is likely to lead to a poor experience doesn't really line up with that. You can still play on Seth's Ravine if you explicitly choose to outside an autohost, as we then assume that you know what you are doing.

To my knowledge you are the first person in over two months to complain about the unfeaturing of Small Supreme Battlefield, so the map can't be that loved. We have plenty of other loveable maps.
+0 / -0
banning a map from autohost is not banning. at all. autohosts are there to give good user experience. therefore the selected map pool there should reflect variety and disable duplicates, broken versions of maps etc.

nobody forbids you to do your thing on own-hosted battles.
+2 / -0
5 years ago
impossible to fap to a map even if i do find a vagina map she is .. without offending her.. an eyes closed pussy
and the units covering it looks like bugs

+0 / -0

5 years ago
wat
+2 / -0
noone complains because its shadowbanned and noone knows its not available anymore , or hidden behind some hoops that need to be jumped over to get it. and yea, you can impose and mansplain™ that putting extra hoops in straight process is not banning, but it defacto is.

i think youre just justifing that bs to yourself to make sure that you look good, while deep down you know its poop but youre so invested in it that its now hard to turn back on it, im not that farr of it, am i?

if youre really concerned with zk image, it gives zk as authoritarian crap bucket of tensions and dramas, and noone really comes in here to unwind, even that steam publish really did nothing or do you have some spike player number graphs to put out that im not aware of?...

its like what goes around in usa with guns. technically guns are legal and so on "noone is coming for your guns™", but we all know the reality...
+1 / -0
quote:
noone complains because its shadowbanned and noone knows its not available anymore

It was publicly announced at the time. There is not so much as a downvote on that post, much less a subsequent discussion in the thread.
+0 / -0
5 years ago
AUrankSmokeDragon technically all is like that. still youre here playing other maps that also are falling tho that category.
+0 / -0
5 years ago
AUrankAdminAquanim

most people who you want to attract are casuals. by pointing out some stray post you just further push the image of authoritarian cesspool where you need to obtain permission to have fun... yes, there is discussion, and so on, but removing it from voting is really messed up. people can decide themself what they want.

i and some other guys from People Can Fly i dirnk beers the other day really would chose to fire you if i would found you doing some fringe explaining and complicating...
+0 / -0


5 years ago
This thread is moronic. unknownrankrooks[vegan] I cannot believe that your intention is to get anything useful done. Feel free to try again with a better thread, if you are capable, or don't. Maybe try saying "how about featuring this map" on the map thread or "how about featuring this list of maps". I'll give you SSBv2 for free.
+4 / -1