avrage wind ratecalculation is (min wind*%chance of min wind)+(avarage wind*%chance avrage wind)
0-2.4 wing avarages 1.2
.6-2.4 wind avarages (.6*(.6/2.4))+((1.2+(.5*.6))*((2.4-.6)/2.4))=1.275
1.2-2.4 wind avarages (1.2*(1.2/2.4))+((1.2+(.5*1.2))*((2.4-1.2)/2.4))=1.5
1.8-2.4 wind avarages (1.8*(1.8/2.4))+((1.2+(.5*1.8))*((2.4-1.8)/2.4))=1.875
2.4-2.4 wind avarages 2.4
0 wind 29.16m/e
.6 wind 27.45m/e (beter then a fusion)
1.2 wind 23.33m/e
1.8 wind 18.66m/e (beter then morfing a moho)
2.4 wind 14.58m/e (beter then a moho)
1.62 wind 20m/e (beter then a geo)
1.92 wind 17.77m/e (beter then a singu)
also wind is beter then most eco because it makes you more e in tiny steps, so there is much less build time->income lag
2 cons can build a wind in 3.5 sec and a singu in 400sec
theoretical "lost" overdrive from 1 mex during build time(for a few benchmarks) 5m/s bp cons*
2con wind
3.5*(2*14%)=.98m "lost"
2con solar
7*(2*(sqrt(1+2/4))-1))= 10m "lost"
2con fusion
100*(2*(sqrt(1+35/4))-1))= 524m "lost"
1/2 a fusion down the drain2con mohogeo
(50+150)*(2*(sqrt(1+25/4))-1))= 877m "lost"
free fusion!2con singu
400*(2*(sqrt(1+225/4))-1))= 5653m "lost"
free singu anyone?!10con singu
80*(2*(sqrt(1+225/4))-1))= 1130 "lost"
20con singu
40*(2*(sqrt(1+225/4))-1))= 565 "lost"