| 1 |
By
going
off
map
bans
it
punishes
the
maps
that
are
more
polarizing
in
terms
of
popularity.
Hide
and
Seek
may
be
banned
by
10%
of
the
player
base,
but
it
could
be
the
favourite
map
of
30%.
Also
with
bans
now
a
thing,
those
that
really
dislike
a
map
shouldn't
have
an
issue
with
a
map
they
don't
like
being
in
the
pool.
|
1 |
By
going
off
map
bans
it
punishes
the
maps
that
are
more
polarizing
in
terms
of
popularity.
Hide
and
Seek
may
be
banned
by
10%
of
the
player
base,
but
it
could
be
the
favourite
map
of
30%.
Also
with
bans
now
a
thing,
those
that
really
dislike
a
map
shouldn't
have
an
issue
with
a
map
they
don't
like
being
in
the
pool.
For
example
looking
at
the
votes
in
Aquanim's
image
in
the
post
above,
if
you
were
just
going
on
dislikes,
Living
Lands
has
a
lot
more
dislikes
than
Wanderlust,
however
it
has
double
the
likes
of
Wanderlust.
[spoiler]https://i.
imgur.
com/Cm4ZsjF.
png[/spoiler]
|
| 3 |
With regards to making the pool smaller, I think we should go the other way. I believe Izirayd (correct me if I'm wrong Izi) uses a lot of his ban slots and I use one. If we are playing a lot of games together in a short period of time we'll be playing the same few maps a LOT. With bans I'd say make the map pool bigger and people can decide for themselves the maps they want to take out.
|
3 |
With regards to making the pool smaller, I think we should go the other way. I believe Izirayd (correct me if I'm wrong Izi) uses a lot of his ban slots and I use one. If we are playing a lot of games together in a short period of time we'll be playing the same few maps a LOT. With bans I'd say make the map pool bigger and people can decide for themselves the maps they want to take out.
|
1v1 Matchmaker Maps Rotation