Battle 775547 detail

Team 1
Chance of victory: 62.8%

PLT_Atosty

Archetherial

Medlazer

Benny4537

SaB0TaG3

Nobbester

[GBC]HarveyN

Jummy

entropy3

Team 2
Chance of victory: 37.2%

Sigero

Slaab

mojjj

CitoCito

ApostleRay

Sires

rooks[vegan]

Leifa

sammojr

Filter: Player:

sort
mojjj 6 years ago (edited 6 years ago) detriment is useless. in close combat, it should delete anything. [Spoiler] i captured a gnat-stunned det and repaired it. then navigated on holdfire with a cloaker directly into a 2-bantha 2-funnel ball + some regular units (it was under the shiled, glaive-range distance to other units). it died within 1 minute, killing only 2 funnels. even if i would have payed for it, this is not a desired outcome, is it? +1 / -0
DeinFreund 6 years ago (edited 6 years ago) When fighting non-striders, the only effective weapon of the detriment is its missile, and unfortunately it is easily blocked by shields. +0 / -0
Alcur 6 years ago (edited 6 years ago) mojjj [Spoiler] I didn't watch it, but you attacked superior forces. I think multiple units that cost less tend to beat very heavy units in Zero-K. However, the Detriment would be cooler in my opinion if its weapons felt more brutal. Yes, maybe that would be better. What if it had two short-ranged nuclear autocannons? A note I added later: I meant about 400 elmos by "short-ranged" since I think that is little for such a strider. +0 / -0
Steel_Blue 6 years ago (edited 6 years ago) King Kriptor +0 / -0
aeonios 6 years ago Yeah detri is seriously underpowered for its cost. Not nearly rioty enough for "the ultimate strider". +0 / -0

Zero-K is a free real time strategy (RTS), that aims to be the best open source multi-platform strategy game available :-)