Please deprive ikinz administrator for violations of the rules

Note that I lack any information on the actual situation. Nevertheless here's what this sounds like:

When you steal something and end up in prison, but the police finds out you also killed someone, then your punishment will be increased.

Gib logs and/or screenshots or it never happened.
Next!

It's probably misleading that the ban message shows only the single admin who added it. There's a policy that in most except the really obvious or egregious cases a ban needs vetting by at least 2 admins. In this case it was 3.

We did have a short "conversation", if you will, on spring server when I went to play a bit of evo. Here it is in entirety:
[Spoiler]

The rest is either someone unrelated trolling you or more likely a clumsy attempt at slander.

quote: 3. You do someone supervises the work of administrators? no

quote: There's a policy that in most except the really obvious or egregious cases a ban needs vetting by at least 2 admins. In this case it was 3.

This just in - Knorke does not speak for, nor does he know anything about, moderating procedure.

More at 11.

(The point being maybe you should stop answering questions you do not know the answer to...)

The actual point is that admins do not generally act unilaterally and without review/

'After half an hour ikinz wrote with another nickname that will constantly increase my punishment for the fact that I am from Ukraine and insulted me.'
I want see more bit about this. ikinz didnt say any word about this sentence in his answer. Why DIVO makes thread but withouth copied proof? How we know that you don't lie?

I recently selfded a factory(from resigned guy) while it was about to destroyed with scythes :D
Does it mean I should reclaim my ban too? :P

P.S. if done properly selfd may make price and may be viable tactic in some context

quote: some admins do have more power than the others. These supervise the regular admins (case in point: PLrankNapoleonRafal[ZK] deadminned recently for calling people lobsters).

Admins 'calling people lobsters' or similiar has been going on since forevever and I doubt anyone "supervised" that.
That "case" seems more like reaction to reports because it happend within hours of:
http://zero-k.info/Forum/Thread/22393?postID=156966#156966 and http://zero-k.info/Forum/Thread/22393?postID=156981#156981 and https://github.com/ZeroK-RTS/Zero-K-Infrastructure/issues/1029

"Supervision" would be when admins check each others behaviour - without reports by players.
There are/were many similiar/worse incidents and posts about it, admins always ignored it.
When it replays are involved my impression is that admins often do not watch them, which would be required of a real review.

quote: There's a policy that in most except the really obvious or egregious cases a ban needs vetting by at least 2 admins. In this case it was 3.

A case of "teamkill" is really obvious. What does that need 3 admins for?
Put the replay-links in description of ban and there should be no doubt.

A bit chatting about how to act in supermegaobvious cases (like teamkill) is not "superversion" either.
Maybe instead discuss muting the "widget spammer" or banning the ""teamkiller"" in chickenmatch.

Or discuss behaviour of admins during their actions:

quote: 19.02.2016 [10:47] Springiee [Chesti]hey DIVO how are you 19.02.2016 [10:48] Springiee [Chesti]DIVO not nice I try to talk nice to you and you just ignore it

"Moderator arbitration is intended to resolve disputes, not prolong them" : Seems it does not apply to mapfeaturers making fun of muted player.
About http://zero-k.info/Battles/Detail/393785 was already a thread.

quote: [23:34] Springiee [Chesti] yes DIVO reclaim your lab and be useles

Did the admins discuss that? Or any of the other cases of admins trolling?

quote: This just in - Knorke does not speak for, nor does he know anything about, moderating procedure.

I interpolate from what I see.
Since long time to me has become clear no admin-forum exists: A sign that coordination can not be good.
If you should be one of those people who believe in a mythical admin-forum ->https://github.com/ZeroK-RTS/Zero-K-Infrastructure/issues/1026
Meaning at best they have the #zkadmin chat with its quirks https://github.com/ZeroK-RTS/Zero-K-Infrastructure/issues/775#issuecomment-153908443
No adminforum, bad forum search, chat only, inprecise descriptions for penalaties = Unable to observe longtermn trolling.
Other tasks like mapfeaturing or forum-moderation are done by conflicting randomness or not at all, why should it be different in this areas?
Is any admin "policy" written down? Or are they different variants of policies and they only exist in the heads, as with mapfeaturing?

well, this thread has gone to the dogs

quote: "Supervision" would be when admins check each others behaviour - without reports by players.

this seems like make-work

quote: There are/were many similiar/worse incidents and posts about it, admins always ignored it.

...or debated it privately and come to a decision, which you don't know about

why exactly you feel the need to refer to moderators as "mapfeaturers" I don't understand either

Enough is enough.