Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

NanoPirate (pls ban)

76 posts, 2424 views
Post comment
Filter:    Player:  
Page of 4 (76 records)
sort
The guy is obviously keeping his elo down (lvl 75 as a gray??). He knows how to play the game well, and whenever is on someone's team will almost always carry them, because of his silver-level playstyle and his 1k elo. I still don't understand how this is allowed. If that's not a good reason to ban him, then you should look at the way he acts.

He's always telling people that they are noobs and basically "can't keep up with him" or "understand his strats". The most off-putting behavior is his obvious Communist self. He's not even joking about it at this point.

(sorry, I thought he was a Nazi, I get Communist and Nazi mixed up a lot.)
+1 / -5
I don't care about most of what he does, but I have serious questions as to how it is technically possible, even if just playing games, that one person's elo can be so far below average.

I see players do worse than him that are at least silver.

If only interacting with the game I don't understand how, even if I were to try to throw all my matches, I could get a new account to barely 1k elo. At some point you lose like 1 point a game, if.
+2 / -0
TheFlyingFortress
I never saw NanoPirate act like a "Nazi", any replays hinting at that unlikeable behavior if that has happend?

Edit: I was not encouraging nazism
+4 / -2

12 months ago
Nanopirate indulges in shitstrats fairly often which is why his elo is kinda low.

Now, if you wanted to blanket ban Austrians I might support that because these devils keep farming my elo XO
+0 / -0
He is a troll, but I would not be so ban-happy @Logix if I were you, tbh...
+8 / -0

12 months ago
ZArankAstran

quote:

Nanopirate indulges in shitstrats fairly often which is why his elo is kinda low.

Now, if you wanted to blanket ban Austrians I might support that because these devils keep farming my elo XO


Does he? As far as I can tell his MO is some wind/solar, a fusion, some small turrets in back row around said eco and then followed by trollcom or some other weird thing.

The simple fact that eco gets prioritized ASAP before trollstrat makes me think this isn't a blatent case of a net negative on the team, should the trollcom fall.

Besides, I'm pretty sure I could get to average elo on a new account by complete accident, trying half ass, doing the same thing.
+2 / -0
12 months ago
show me 1 replay where would do anything like intentionally keeping my elo down lol

Logix is just mad cuz bad because i always own his sorry ass xD
+4 / -4
12 months ago
This post has been downvoted below -5 and collapsed, click here to expand
ATrankNanoPirate you can't be saying that someone is sorry. Look at you, you're on zero-k almost 24/7, even when you get off you're back in, max, 1 hour. Grown man wasting all of his time without a job, or playing zero-k while on the job, which shows you prioritize zero-k in your life
+0 / -11
TheFlyingFortress
12 months ago
Lol, lets all try this method: No arguments -> proceed to insult.
+0 / -0
12 months ago
NanoPirate, http://zero-k.info/Battles/Detail/1754154
+0 / -0
12 months ago
"No arguments -> proceed to insult" kids talking like im the one who started the insult. insane meat riding from theflyingfortress for nanopirate
+0 / -4
TheFlyingFortress
I was saying your arguments were invalid, not that you started insulting.
+0 / -0
Accusations of Nazism are unnecessary on the public forum I imagine, nor is it necessary to start insulting Nano for no reason. Now, I have many gripes with Nano, which is why I have him ignored, but it's hardly fair to ask for a ban for him keeping his elo down. That's not far from being a 1-trick player, who can excel in teams that benefit their trick.

I do, however, think that keeping one's elo down that far is exceptionally scummy, and ruins balance in anything smaller than a near-full lobpot, and I find that behavior unenjoyable for all involved, except perhaps Nano himself.

https://zero-k.info/Battles/Detail/1745489
https://zero-k.info/Battles/Detail/1430830

Here are two games I played in, where I feel like Nano's deceptively low WHR ranking afforded the winning team an unfair advantage and ruined balance, seeing as they look like otherwise better games.
+3 / -0
Logix certainly isn't the best courier of this message considering he's in a vitric residence adjacent to NanoPirate, but he is right that NanoPirate displays poor behavior in the pot and I don't understand how he can be in the lowest rank bracket while having more playtime than 80% of the active playerbase—including me.

Like, I was confused when he was brown dwarf—and now he's lower than that‽‽‽‽‽
+8 / -0
12 months ago
logix mad cuz bad xD
+1 / -2
12 months ago
@Mudosaka: you linked the same game twice.
+0 / -0

12 months ago
The moderators are aware of NanoPirate having said some edgelordy racist stuff in the past, but not more recently than the most recent ban. If that is still occurring, report it and we will action it expeditiously.

As for the playstyle and rating aspect, you are encouraged to report replays in which you feel NanoPirate has played in a way that is particularly disrespectful to their team. Speaking as a player, I certainly do not feel that NanoPirate is enriching my teams room experience, on the whole.
+3 / -1

12 months ago
quote:
you linked the same game twice.

Also, it's 15 months old. Can you check that this is the game(s) you intended to link?
+0 / -0
12 months ago
This post has been downvoted below -5 and collapsed, click here to expand
kinda sad when an admin doesnt understand that his elo system simply doesnt work as intended...

just face it dude, i am low rank because i exclusively play large teams

go clean up in your own yard before you accuse me of random bullshit

besides, im far from being the worst player in zk, there are tons of players who play far worse than me, and nobody ever complains, so go bully someone else plz
+0 / -8
12 months ago
also @Mudosaka maybe u could actually make that point if i ever played something other than large teams lol

but i dont^^
+0 / -2
Page of 4 (76 records)