Again, I resigned early here after I lost my com. How is that a bannable offense?

My fac was destroyed soon after my com died, so I would've had to resign anyway. My aggressive base placement was high risk-high reward but not ban-worthy. Plenty of players do com rushes and other risky moves without getting banned.

When you got kicked by the community through a kick vote and not just once, you should very well know that what you are doing have crossed many lines. I must have you know that the community is crazily tolerable to many trollish behaviors but in your case, you chose a playstyle which involve deliberately setting yourself up for failure while very much feeding metals to the opponents.

What deliberate failures are we talking about?
In B1664810 32 on TheRockFinal, you built a frontline geo, you already got an history of building frontline geo. There is also this one time you morph the geo when the enemy is at your face. I remember it because I reclaim the geo (because you went afk after building) before enemy blows it up which can destroy south fortifications.

Other than that, you build shipyard in a non-sea map, then dug a path forward. Sure, you might not be the first one who do that but the people who did don't do it almost every time like you. They have the self awareness of it doesn't work while inciting hate from the community. You on other hand insist to continue inciting hate from the community like a spoilt brat.

While I can and I am sure many can tell you like the game because you immediately returns after the ban is lifted. You also not incapable because I have seen replays of what you can do when you plays normally. However, despite your interest in the game and capability to do well, you insist on a team griefing playstyle.

If it is up to me, I would just pban you.

I am appealing by ban because I didn't do anything wrong yesterday besides (supposedly) not communicating with my team before making risky moves (although higher ranked players can apparently get away with not communicating?) and resigning too early when I failed.

One player failing a high-risk strategy in a 32-player battle doesn't hurt the team that much for people to be this annoyed. Besides, my history of failing often is already taken into account by my MMR.

What i think rightfully annoys people is that you choose to play a risky or even ineffective strategy, then when it fails, you dont even attempt to make up the deficit (through your share of apm) and instead resign, leaving your team to clean up the mess you made.

Especially if all that occurs within 5 min and on repeat, people take notice that you cant be relied on to stay, and might just resign out of seemingly nowhere.

If you dont support your team, you cannot expect them to be willing to support you, or in the long term, want to play with you.

Everyone wants to have fun playing zk, but it shouldnt come at the cost of hindering your team

Have you tried not being too sensitive to being banned? It's just a game, go do something else