I also think this was a waste of time

Weird is that Kingstad didn't even try to win to kill me and indaled at the same time. It's kind of unfair if you gang in FFA. It's called 2 vs 1 vs 1 vs1, not FFA if you do that.

Indaled and I were fighting non stop from the start UNTIL you got a super weapon, duh. Later when he got a super weapon I wanted to strike at whomever was the biggest threat, but I was wiped out multiple times (by you) and never had anything to attack anyone with. I was making those singus after having the ones in my base blown up for the 5th or so time in an effort to not have that happen again. We didnt have a pact or anything, I dont even think he knew I had those singus.

Kingstad you never tried to win. I was constantly attacked by indaled, 2 detriments and also you with your silos and other stuff. How was I the biggest threat when you all ganged on me? If I was you I would try to win the game by killing indaled and me. You guys clearly need to learn how to paly FFA. For example, I never attacked Leifa and yet he sent two detriments to me. Also I only tactical nuked Nikelaos one time but by that time I was close in winning the map.

Problem is not the fact that I lost the match, the problem was that I was 1 vs 3 all game after I made superweapon even if indaled had one for himself.
That was a team vs 1 gameplay, not FFA.

I find that looking non-dangerous is very important in FFA. I think Forever you are not good at looking non-threatening. PetTurtle is supremely good at this as an example.

I have very little idea on how to achieve that. I think i generally fail to appear non-threatening regardless of my actual position in the game.

Perhaps the hypothetical future anonymous mode would help with that.

On/Off is inherited from your initial states when construction finishes. This may be because the engine (maybe no longer) sets the state when a unit is completed. It would be worth fixing, and would basically require a reimplementation of the On/Off command.

Forever in a sense FFA is quite random because it depends on a lot of interactions between people. There are so many actions a player can take, and gathering information can be difficult, so you'll almost always be able to blame other players for a loss. It is hard to know when to gang up on someone, and I think players generally don't do it enough. Blaming people is counterproductive.

quote: On an different note. There seems to have been a change to the map? I couldnt use below the platform. Spiders wouldnt climb down, amphs and subs couldnt move down there. Spent 3 ages pulling my hair out in frustration

The impassible sea was enforced.

Yeah, typemaps that block movement are awful with the hidden rules they introduce. If only there was an acidic version of this map...

I've gotta say - for a thread that starts off with frustration, the ZK community does it again with a civil debate, a short gameplay guide, 2 bug clarifications, 2 feature proposals, 1 retroactively added feature, and a new youtube commentary - all before the first page is full and without a single downvote.