last game

yeah I meant that.

WHAT????????

izirayd well he was perma banned, unless you think both Firepluk and Zero-K are going to be here in the next century too.

Edit: Shaman corrected me that Firepluk was not perma banned, he is right, my above mentioned message is misleading.

Shaman oh sorry, I thought he was blocked from the game itself for eternity too, my bad. If he is blocked only from the forum, it isn't that terrible. Altough, speaking of it, I do not remember Firepluk being toxic here, on the forum, so I do not see a reason for him to be banned from accesing it (moreover perma banned).
And, it still doesn't answer the question, whether there was some big breach of the rules preceding his ban, or just you getting continually more and more fed up.

I guess my problem is that I dislike the concept of perma ban of general. Using it seems little too strong for such trivial things like a pc game. I mean, if you detect some bots and trolls spreading dangerous disinformation on some social networks, then sure, perma ban is in order, because these are important, real-life things, but perma banning someone from a pc game... really? Yeah, just ban him for three months, and if he is toxic after this time again then ban him over and over until he changes his perspective or quits, but perma banning for such trivialities is harsh. What if in two years Firepluk becomes a nice guy (or a girl, to be gender neutral... hehe it would be fun if Firepluk was some toxic girl all along. Altough you would know from some mumbles, or would you?) who wishes everyone glhf before a match starts, helps new players, etc.? Would it be too time consuming for you mods to ban people repeatedly with a three month period?

Note: Shaman is not an Admin and cannot ban anyone for any reason.

Firepluk does not have any active bans. What Firepluk does have is a warning to him: follow the CoC and stop making negative comments about your teammates or you will be banned if we find out about it. Firepluk's list of penalties and abuse reports dates back to 2014 and is... huge.

Firepluk's last ban ended on February 22nd. If Firepluk wants to come back and can avoid insulting their teammates or griefing, they're welcome to do so.

Edit: oh sniped

Not saying I banned him or anything or that I have the power to.

Just trying to prevent misinformation from starting a huge flame war (which is what the downvote is for: misinformation, when the part calling it a permanent ban is spoilered or something I'll remove the downvote.) Calling an innocuous warning a permanent ban is a huge stretch, especially with the recent allegations of abuse. Most people will probably just skim this and go "oh wow, text block" and conclude 'yeah he's permabanned' because of the 2121 end date without actually reading the 'warning' part or noticing the lack of blocking attached to that punishment. Hence my preemptive attempt at correcting the situation.

Probably warnings need red text or something? This would probably be a blind fix.

I was correcting Silent_AI

quote: is he coming back

nope

I miss firepluk, he provided me with a lot of entertainment over the years