Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Nanoframe spam is a problem

3 posts, 49 views
Post comment
Filter:    Player:  
sort
3 hours ago
BAN nanoframe spam.

Nanoframe spam is still to overpowered, and abusive. At this point an artifical cap of something like 2 nano every 5 seconds per con is needed.
+1 / -0
3 hours ago
I don't think it should be a rule, it should be something solved with game mechanics. Ideally low value nanoframes would not exist at all other than visually for the opponents, unless they deliberately want to attack it. Projectiles could phase through (while still damaging them), units could be able to trample them, and it should not effect pathing. Also have a-move ignore them, and not emit radar blips either.
+1 / -0
The way I saw this post, thought "I bet if I go to his profile there's going to be a game he lost against USrankfahx within 10 minutes of him making this post", went to Tarkin's profile, and found a game he lost against fahx 7 minutes before making this post.

He's totally right though, it's very stupid and should be mercilessly obliviated from the game.
+0 / -0