Battle 2449222 detail

Team 1
Chance of victory: 54.9%

mojjj

katastrophe

Medlazer

m1sterX

Tunacantine

Falelovsky

Neptunum

DogeLord081

Potatogamercat

vslickerjet

schogetten16

AngstSorge

Team 2
Chance of victory: 45.1%

Ugga2

EnderFrog

Blxssom

manero

iwantusername

MasterLands

NieMamPlanu0_o

der_zitte

XYBORG

RKeil

Beninging

Filter: Player:

sort
mojjj 3 hours ago was the balancer high? +0 / -0
Alcur 3 hours ago How so? Did you check the "current rating" values? +0 / -0
mojjj 106 minutes ago 3 blue stars vs 0 blue stars. that's quite relieable statement about the experience. other colours are more or less random, depending on the player and/or map. +0 / -0
SnuggleBass 72 minutes ago (edited 72 minutes ago) I yearn for a day where we judge the worth of a gamer by the content of their WHR and not by the colour of their star. Team 1 mean WHR = 1856 Team 2 mean WHR = 1856 The matchmaker just tries to match rating, and it does a pretty good job with the players it has. Note that Blxssom is higher rated than any of the blues despite being silver. +1 / -0
Aquanim 2 minutes ago (edited 8 seconds ago) I think that the rating of a player is a pretty good guide to their average skill level. I am far less sure that the average rating of a team is a good guide to how skillfully it will play. WHR is a system that was designed for and has mathematical guarantees - in a 1v1 setting. In teams games all the assumptions go out the window, and using average-WHR to balance games is essentially no more than a reasonable guess. +0 / -0

Zero-K is a free real time strategy (RTS), that aims to be the best open source multi-platform strategy game available :-)